“Wonder of Wonders”
That was the subject line I attached on an email last
week sent to friends, former colleagues, and others for whom Fannie and Freddie
still are important matters.
I was heralding that the Washington Post was going to review Tim Howard’s book, “The
Mortgage Wars,” in its Sunday (1-19) business section.
That’s the same Washington Post which, over the years,
had published about two dozen editorials blasting, putting down, and bitching about
Fannie’s business, leadership, operations, politics, or activities.
To my very pleasant surprise, the Post—or more specifically
Steven Pearlstein, a former Post economics/financial reporter, who now pens (laptop’s/pc’s?) twice monthly columns for the Steve Bezos’
owned Post--did a fabulous job with his review. (See link below.)
Pearlstein nailed the critical role played by the
nation’s major banks and investment banks 2008’s international financial
disaster in 2008 and the fact that Fannie and Freddie did not cause that crisis
(echoing dozens of other reports).
He didn’t exonerate F&F, but wrote their purchases of
private label securities (PLS)--originated and issued by the behemoth financial
institutions, with unrealistic credit rating—went bad twice as much as their
own mortgage backed bonds. (Between 2005 and 2007, the big banks and Wall
Street firms issued more than $2 Trillion worth of poorly underwritten PLS and
sold them worldwide.)
I thought his Howard compliments were genuine. For a smart and experienced guy, Peralstein admitted how informative
he found the Tim’s narrative.
Pearlstein offered two other opinions which are spot on.
He suggested the Bob Corker (R-Tenn.)-Mark Warner (D-Va.)
bill calls for a huge amount of new private mortgage insurance capital (some
estimates are a fresh $100 Billion), which may never emerge (and what happens then?).
And he notes the big banks—which are the major
beneficiaries of C-W--have a lousy track record of mortgage market reliability,
moving in and out of the home loan market as greater profits emerge elsewhere, which means it's shaky to rely on them as the steadying mortgage presence.
(Excuse me for noting that’s a problem F&F never had.)
But, while Pearlstein earns major kudos from me, the Post
just gets continued flak for egregiousness.
The Washington Post, a major national newspaper, has not and
still doesn’t think it’s necessary--before the Pearlstein book review, after
the book review, introducing the book review, or in a book review sidebar story--to
delineate the catalyst for Tim’s book, the
three federal court decisions, issued more than 17 months ago—by Federal
District Judge Richard Leon--quashing all charges against Howard, Frank Raines,
and Leanne Spencer, who were Fannie Mae’s CFO, Fannie’s CEO, and Fannie
Comptroller. respectively.
As his legal decisions proved, Judge Leon showed the
Fannie execs were hounded from office in 2004 by a slanderous Bush
Administration political assault.
Let me repeat, the oddity which vexes me. The Washington
Post, still, has yet to publish one word about the revealing and liberating 2012
pronouncements, authored by then somewhat obscure but now suddenly NSA-infamous,
Judge Leon,
who has served a dozen years on the US Federal District Court for the District of
Columbia.
It was a heroic Judge Leon, who ruled in the fall of
2012, that no jury anywhere could convict the Fannie Three of securities fraud,
based on 67 million pages of evidence
presented to his court, and then dismissed all charges with a “summary
judgment” opinion—eight fraught-filled years for the defendants after the
allegations were hurled!
Other papers and wire services wrote about the Leon
decisions, but not the Post.
Given all of the phony anti-Fannie rhetoric against the
company and its officers—much of it carried in the Post’s new pages, columns,
and editorials--one might think local Judge Leon’s definitive rejection of the
charges would find their way into a major national newspaper, serving the
communities where these well-known individuals lived and worked?
Was there nothing to report form Leon's ruling?
Plaintiffs fail to point
to any evidence from
which a reasonable jury could infer that [former CFO Timothy] Howard believed
any of these transactions were improper or sought to conceal them from the
public. Indeed, plaintiffs' own expert recognized that earnings
management does not necessarily show an improper purpose.
... In sum, plaintiffs
offer no evidence from
which a reasonable juror could conclude that any of Howard's statements
concerning Fannie accounting practices
or internal controls were made with an intent to deceive, or were otherwise
made without any reasonable basis.
Plaintiffs' theories on Howard's
scienter are insufficient to withstand his summary judgment motion, particularly in light of the overwhelming
evidence of Howard's good faith.
(Leon
issued three separate decisions, first on Howard, then Raines, and finally
Spencer, but all were based on the same principles.)
Our good friend, David Fiderer, also
wrote about the Leon decision and quoted the Judge extensively. (DF’s work appears in the link below.)
Late last week, when I heard the book review was coming,
I asked a friend, “How do you think the Post will finesse the legal decisions
exonerating Raines, Howard, and Spencer?”
The simple answer, we found out, is the Post ignored
them.
I am not complaining one bit about Pearlstein’s review, which
I believe was solid, illuminating, very informative, and even gutsy (are you
reading and listening Congress?).
But part of Howard’s and his colleagues’ story was the
extreme lengths Fannie’s business and political opponents went to destroy
careers and lives, using a shockingly inept but politically potent and scathing
regulatory report which then got blessed by the Bush SEC. (Again, all of that
is in Tim’s book.)
The Post, for some obscure reason, may never cover Leon’s
Fannie opinions--and shame on it for that choice--but some of the political shenanigans
which Howard documented in “The Mortgage
Wars,” are ripe for public sharing and explanations, since those old Office
of Financial Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO)
records surrounding it’s 2004 report and a HUD IG examination of the agency,
are approaching 10 years old and have nothing to do with Director Mel Watt’s Federal
Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), OFHEO’s successor—except as guide for “how
today’s agency never should work with its regulated institutions and the media.”
ument
Those old documents, mere history now since the statute of
limitations has run out on possible wrong doing, could shed some light on
current personnel who worked the Fannie dirty tricks back then and even a few
who’ve gone but still hang out in DC.
It’s something for the new FHFA Director to consider, as
well as something which might appeal to and interest a lot of his former
congressional colleagues as they go to work charting possible new approaches to
providing understandable mortgage credit fairly to all communities in the
nation and all of those who can qualify
for the same.
“A lie
can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”
(Attributed to Mark Twain.)
Maloni, 1-20-2014
9 comments:
Bill, did you happen to see Warners new article in the Richmond Times? We're overdue for housing finance reform. Sadly I composed a response but cannot post it because I do not have a Facebook Account, not interested in one either. Would like your opinion on my comments anyway. Here is my comment:
"Right, and I learned at a very young age that telling only half the truth, is just a lie. You failed to mention that private label, non-conforming sub-prime garbage loans, were put to the GSEs for the taxpayer to absorb, thus the 188 billion loss. Who created this problem? TBTF banks that have been recently paying the FHA fines for their fraudulent ponzi schemes. Yes Fannie and Freddie were caught up in it, but the private label cash grab for the mortgage business is what created the 2008 crisis, fact. Fannie and Freddie DID NOT CAUSE the housing failure.
So now let's urgently hand the mortgage business over to big banks that caused this mess in the first place. This new proposal is unproven, risky and could have severe negative economic impact. No thank you, because this one definitely does not pass the smell test.
FDR created the GSEs to provide liquidity and the 2008 crisis recovered because the GSEs stepped in when everyone else ran. You bet the recovery was taxpayer supported, but it was a success because as you mentioned the GSEs have paid back all of the money they were given. You can't say that the many other taxpayer supported bailouts yielded the same results, because they didn't.
And what about LIQUIDITY? That's one fuzzy item these new GSE elimination proposals don't have an answer for because there isn't one. Banks stop lending in bad times. Who will be their to provide liquidity in crisis, the taxpayer? Good luck getting that money back."
Two friends sent me comments this morning on a "F&F article," but no predicate.
I assume this was that.
They noted that "30-1" sized the market or F&F's share at "$5Billion," when it actually is $5 Trillion."
But, hey, when you're "30-1", bombast and errors are good.
If you would like--since I do have that access--I'll try and post for you. Let me know.
Email me.
Now that's funny. Only 5 billion? I will email you.
Sorry Bill, I didn't see your email in your profile. Can you tell me what it is?
billmaloni21@gmail.com
(It's at the top of the blog.)
I think I spotted the confusion.
There are TWO major pieces in the Richmond Times, today, on Fannie and Freddie.
Warner's and one from Jim Miller, former OMB Director.
Here's Miller's.
http://www.timesdispatch.com/opinion/their-opinion/columnists-blogs/guest-columnists/miller-warner-s-way-is-not-the-way-to-fix/article_f6262a4a-7955-555c-b789-6bc634d776c1.html
supreme clothing
yeezy boost 350
off white x nike
kobe byrant shoes
yeezy shoes
supreme outlet
supreme clothing
curry shoes
curry shoes
golden goose
click this link here now additional hints you could look here Dolabuy Fendi go to my blog article source
their website Dolabuy Celine from this source Dolabuy Loewe visite site aaa replica bags
Post a Comment