Le plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Yes, I have one…too!!
My cover has been blown and now everyone wants to use my top
secret listening and transcribing device (I nicknamed it “Big Ear” and "Little Transcript)).
I’ve used this unique tool to propel my career as an
“ace” GSE commentator and, now, it has been outed by those White House clowns
advising President Trump, opening him to all sorts of political grief.
It's partly my BAD, I never should have permitted this POTUS to
borrow the contraption when he was calling Ukraine, the Saudis, and Russia.
I’ve been using mine for years to listen and never got caught “researching”
politicians in the nation’s capital. I don’t employ it often, but often enough
to maintain my GSE primacy chops!
Then, Huzzah! After two visits last month to the nation’s last remaining Radio Shack, they torqued mine up. What I have now allows me to capture what
my subjects are thinking before they say or write it.
That’s why I appear so casually prescient when describing
what any individual truly has on his/her mind before they utter it, especially
the anti-GSE crowd.
For instance, this weekend Big Ear picked up some juicy morsels from what FHFA Director Mark
Calabria’s was thinking before Treasury announced on Monday
new mandatory capital deals with both Fannie and Freddie.
Anyway, here are some of MC’s weekend thoughts.
Zippity doo-dah, zippity…I can’t wait
for Monday and those letters go out binding them to yet unwritten to our "other conditions."
It’s all set, Mnuchin has stepped
back on GSE issues and I stepped up. Zippity doo-dah. I need to practice what
I’ll say to my fans and the others.
Let’s see? Here, here, get them while
you can. They may be lightly scratched and dinged—yet we still will call them
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--they still will be in the mortgage business, but I have
a few changes in mind because of which they must signup before I let them apply
their skills and talents to supporting America’s low, moderate, and middle income
families eligible to qualify for reliable GSEs mortgage loans.
But, don’t ask me for details, as I need to add more scuffs and nicks to them while I can. Just wait until
you leap at those first few GSE public offerings of entities, which won’t look
just like today’s version—let alone the pre-2008 version. (Weren’t those spiraling
down somewhere?)
Let’s face it, despite
my breezy language to those naïfs on the Senate Banking Committee, who approved
my nomination, I really have little liking nor respect for the GSEs. I know I begged to get a regulatory job with the Trump Admin—anything to
get away from Pence-- and my big bank buddies insured me that any damage I can
do to Fannie and Freddie will be appreciated (and rewarded) by those same GSE critics
and opponents. I know Steve Mnuchin and the POTUS want the GSEs put back in the
hands of private ownership (that’s you Mr. and Mrs. Investor). But, yak, gag,
barf, whoever heard of a government agency with shareholders??
Yes, they are efficient and better
run than the banks. Yes, they stunned everyone in DC, including me, when they
paid back more than $310 Billion for Hank Paulson’s 2008 $190 Billion gift and
then strapped and carried on their shoulders the nation’s entire conventional residential
(non-FHA/VA) mortgage markets, single and multi-family.
But, B.F.D!
Unless I try now to cripple the GSEs,
when given this opportunity, who will push them out of the government’s door and
hobble them enough so that they can’t still help millions of mortgagors going
forward, plus set their new investors up to make billions?? Best of all, with
Mnuchin’s help, I’ll make sure Fannie’s and Freddie’s execs will have to comply
with all of the “sand in the gears” bells and whistles Kudlow and I placed in
the Treasury Report before anything real happens with ending “Conservatorship.” Plus we can snap the regulatory whip going forward to make sure they stay in
line.
How can those schmucks stop me or say
“no,” I’m their regulator and the
Conservator!!
Thankfully, I anticipated this first
“public step” to satisfy my longtime goals and helped load up the Treasury’s “Report
to Congress” with just the right mix of major new internal costs and delay
procedures to achieve my real objectives, had Treasury—with my humble
assistance-- demand the GSEs sign up to cooperate on those steps, so nobody can
say the Trump Administration blackmailed the GSEs. (I 'll love my new powers and additional staff I’ll get out of the deal, because there it is right in the Treasury
Report. Screw you Fed, OCC, and FDIC!) How did my big bank buddies put it when
I got this job, “Don’t be inconsistent? You need to keep trying to help your
friends and destroy our enemies!
”Yep, this Boy Scout is large, in
charge, and walking tall! That’s why I insist my FHFA team call me “Buford
Pusser!” (Let them look him up!)
Soon I can shrink Fannie’s and
Freddie’s size, impact, and foodprint, with nobody in Congress saying “boo,”
because they don’t really care or understand the myriad mortgage or capital
issues and players running the game today. Some will gripe about “low-income
goals,” but Hell the banks don’t want that business anyway so I can give in and
make them 50% of the GSEs total annual business, which they were back in the
90’s.
Working on a package of bank-like
capital requirements, too, despite the fact I know F&F don’t look or
operate as banks will drive up the GSE cost of doing business. And, I can
easily hide behind “safety and soundness” concerns, when I explain, With the
GSEs, since so many in this town have no idea about the role of capital, one never can have too much capital.
(It’s not my job to worry about consumer mortgage costs which obviously will go
up.)
And—to my great joy-- it will cost F&F even more when
we tell the world the net $120 Billion or so the GSEs have paid back since 2013,
on top of the original $190 Billion, just isn’t enough to repay the nation for
its GSE support since 2008 and they have to pay us an “exit fee.” Hot damn, that will cause a few sphincters to tighten
up!
I hope those Lefties don’t give me
any sass about trying to offset those costs by trying to monetize the reverse value
the GSEs represented for their liquidity role post-2008 which produced huge affordable
mortgage volumes without generating any losses (which—duh-- was how the GSEs
paid back all of that money to the taxpayers).
But, as I believe, there will be
nobody making that GSE case nor any other when we force them to “negotiate.” There
won’t be any give-and-take in those meetings, just us giving them orders and
Fannie and Freddie taking them.
(Don't you love the way my targets think in highlights and punctuation marks! WRM)
Maloni,
10-2-2019
18 comments:
Let me be clear if the past few blogs haven't been so.
I think Calabria is a spoiler, a skunk at the GSE picnic, who senses he has no obstacles because Fannie and Freddie have no industry or political clout; so who gives the GSEs execs some spine and testosterone to resist what the FHFA director wants/hopes to do to them??? (Will Freddie cut their own deal--as it often did in the past--with Calabria?? Watch close Mr. Benson, you may find yourself alone in more ways than one.)
And for those of you just seeking to make money on your GSE investment, will neutered GSEs
still generate income in the tiny parking place Calabria will put them??
He will be given a dose of reality by the investment bankers he will need to recapitalize them.
Anon--
From your lips.....
Let me understand this a little better.
The Obama Administration cooked the books, created the NWS to fund ACA, had their guy Watt in power for eight years, then the 5th. Circuit says what “they” did was illegal and basically reversed the NWS and somehow you continually find fault with the GSE progress. Doesn’t that sound like a partisan hack job?
Myself and others are pleased with the progress under this Administration. It FAR EXCEEDED anything the past accomplished.
This fraud and theft lays at the doorstep of every Liberal who voted in a Democrat.
You are like the WP, NYT, CNN & MSNBC. Shouting out and accusing your enemies of your own sins.
^^
What exactly has this Administration done? The NWS is still in effect. Whatever money the GSEs are allowed to keep is offset by an increase in the preferred shares held by the Treasury. The preferred have to be redeemed at PAR plus interest.
Hint: What this Administration could have done after the en banc ruling:
1) We are going to abide by the decision of the Court and reverse the policies of the illegal Kenyan Muslim Terrorist Administration
2) The PSPA are considered redeemed in full
3) The $25 billion in overpayment will be used to offset taxes or other monies due to the Tresasury from the GSEs
4) The GSEs are hereby released from conservatorship
5) The warrants will not be exercised
6) In return, litigants will drop all lawsuits agains the U. S. Treasury
Curious as to why none of these steps has been executed by this Administration.
Which Administration was very clear verbally they want the Conservatorship to end? Obama and Watt?
Who has a plan, regardless if you like it or agree to it?
If a Democrat was in office, you know exactly what would be happening. Nothing. Just look to ANYTHING controlled by Democrats and you will see failure.
Be patient. After ten years, things are happening. Slowly, but happening.
^^
Pls explain to me as what is happening. Why do you need a plan to end conservatorship.
If someone stole my car, is there a plan needed to return the car to me?
Why is the Adminisration fighting the en banc ruling? Why hasn't the Administration settled?
Better yet, why doesn't the Administration agree with the ruling and release the GSEs from conservatorship. Releasing the GSEs from conservatorship doesn't require any Congressional action. Calabria can set the capital requirements to $3 billion and they are free.
The NWS is still in place. The PSPA is still in place. Absolutely nothing has changed since this Adminstration took office. Oh yes, the put out a nice document that talks of motherhood and apple pie. That and $5.00 will buy you 1.5 shares of FNMA.
Yet, all it takes a stroke of a pen to release the GSEs from conservatorship.
I'll repeat a fundamental.
I heavily criticized the Obama Admin for what it was doing to the GSEs (and his weakness vis-a-vis Putin and Russia). But BHO is gone and control is in the hands of the Trump Admin.
Ending Conservatorship could have been done easily when Mnuchin two and half years ago said it was coming.
If/when it comes--as I've written--it will have major encumbrances.
Do you know why people do not respect federal government?
they are a bunch of bastards. No shame, no moral. Serve people? No. Harass? Yes.
Gov is a political tool for election winners to suppress losers AND average folks.
The view was that the Kenyan Muslim Terrorist was evil and stealing money to pay for Obamacare and this Administration was doing the right thing.
And this Administration has done NOTHING different.
Soooo just curious did you have any additional information on timelines or the capital buffer? Or are we howling at the moon as we discussed earlier ;-)
TruGld--
"No" on both.
But I have my green cheese, handy.
As best I can, I'll try and keep out the garbage emails I've been sent soliciting lending business.
If anybody knows how to keep that crap out permanently, I'll all ears.
Maloni
Post a Comment