2015
President’s Day edition, Yay GM
Thank
you, NYT’s Gretchen Morgenson
If he
listens, Hensarling Could Be a Star
Please read Gretchen Morgenson’s F&F column first, if
you haven’t already. (Go ahead, read it again!)
It’s fabulous, simply fabulous.
Why is her column
so good, since much of it has been written before by (the real) Tim Howard and
more recently by Michael Krimminger and Mark Calabria, as well as law professor
Richard Epstein?
Because her paper is
the New York Times, it gets instant
attention—the Sunday Times has well over two million readers--it has reach and could
even appeal to some GOP traditionalists–like many in Congress—attracted by Ms.
Morgenson GOP lineage. She once time was part of the GOP’s conservative wing
working as Steve Forbes presidential campaign press secretary.
More fabulous
I am not sure how
many of those two plus million read Gretchen’s work read, but--because of her
vast Times forum and its inherent credibility/integrity-- her column can spread
this story in a way that the previous writers could never hope, no matter how
eloquent they are/were.
On a good week, I get 700 hits to my blog. TH717 gets
four times or more of that. That ain’t close to GM’s foot print. Analogy: Think
of me driving around DC with an “Eat at Joe’s” bumper sticker” and GM touting
the same eatery on satellite radio and cable TV.
Ms. Morgenson is not
a F&F-friend, but she has produced an enviable record of taking on the big banks
over their numerous operational shortcomings, so she has stature.
Corporate investors
throughout our country should be concerned, if the Obama Administration bent
and broke laws to deal with a federal revenue deficit or employed the old F&F
animus and showed its too often displayed political “numb nuts” propensity.
If the US Treasury blatantly
can take from F&F investors, it can do the same to targeted others.
Without intending to
do so, Ms. Morgenson also may have teed up a congressional opportunity
that—without this glorious attention—may escape the Congress (and still may, if
the Hill doesn’t see the totality of the issue and not just see some F&F
impact).
Check back in below.
Jeb Hensarling’s Week
All
week (before the GM column), I considered what GSE issues I was going to
discuss in my “President’s Day blog,” and I kept tripping on stuff HBC
Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.) was doing.
The
book sale
There he was last Wednesday in a congressional hearing room,
extolling a flawed Peter Wallison book (i.e.,
flawed research courtesy of Ed Pinto produces a flawed book). In his tome,
Peter again tries to hoist the nation’s 2008 financial meltdown on the shoulders
of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I grow tired listing all of the sources who have
rebutted his premise.
Maybe, as I am told they do with old jokes in prison, I’ll
just give these refutations numbers and yelp out “15” (meaning the Fed staff, the FCIC staff/report, the Treasury, David Min, Paul Krugman, David Fiderer, etc. etc....) the next time I see
Peter’s thesis.
In our last blog, we pointed out new Pete’s book and his current
belief that sales have been held back by left wingers writing bad reviews about
his newest tome. But as I suggested, maybe it isn’t political, maybe those
folks just don’t like the book.
A sidebar story to last Wednesday’s HBC hosted Wallison book
event, was Peter’s answer when asked by a questioner, “If there was any virtue
in F&F moving out of conservatorship?”
Peter Wallison: No,
if we ever let them out of conservatorship, they would go back to the business
that they were in before. I’m perfectly happy that government is taking all
their profits, because it keeps them from gaining capital. If they had capital
there would be tremendous pressure in Congress to release them. We have to
come up with a new system, unfortunately we don’t know what such a system will
look like. Once we come up with a new system, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
will be gone.
To me what leaped out is Wallison’s stated belief—and he’s been around
DC and in and out of congressional offices/committees/hearings to understand
the drill—that an Obama executive action to allow F&F to build capital from
earnings would have bipartisan appeal and encourage the
Congress to acquiesce to returning F&F to a more fulsome mortgage market
role.
GSE fans, please hold that pregnant with possibility thought GSE fans, while
I turn back to Jeb.
Rest of Week; HBC
Report to Budget Committee
In a mid-week Committee markup of non-statutory language, Hensarling’s
Committee Democrats attempted to amend the HBC prose headed to the House Budget
Committee. (Each House committee sends one of these, offering a variety of
opinions on issues in their respective committee’s jurisdiction.)
One proposal from John Carney (D-Del.) suggested the committee should
note Treasury has been repaid by F&F, adding some “Mom and apple pie” mortgage
market verbiage supporting the 30 year fixed rate financing.
Chairman Hensarling’s negative response was foreshadowed a few weeks
previously when GOP HBC member Ed Royce (R-Cal.) struck the unusual pose of
claiming that F&F haven’t repaid the federal government any money. Royce
ignored the many media references to those actions, as well as verification in
the President’s Budget the two have repaid @$225 Billion, at 2014’s end, after Treasury
gave them $187.5 Billion in 2008. (The $225B was repaid in just two years,
starting in 2012.)
It must have been too threatening, too truthful, since the majority
scuttled the Carney language and all other D proposals.
How about SEC-register every T-bill/bond?
After ignoring the F&F debt repayment history, Jeb did lead his merry men and women, in the same committee
exercised, to recommend Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules--which
apply to publicly traded US corporations--should also attach, as well, to the
US Treasury’s debt raising bond activities!!
“It is only fair that our government should have to follow the
high standards of transparency, accuracy and accountability required of our
nation’s job-creating companies,” said the House Financial Services Committee
spokesman.
Now the politics here are a little ditzy, but Jeb and his colleagues
must believe that it’s too easy for Treasury to issue debt, raising necessary money
for government operations, so they want to consider tossing sand in the
government’s debt activities and slow that process down (although I am not sure
to what end).
Falling into their
laps…….
But the best was yet to come for Chairman Hensarling—or others in
Congress, if Jed doesn’t answer the bell—when Gretchen Morgenson handed them a
massive political opportunity in her wonderful column this weekend.
As seen/read above, Ms. Morgenson detailed how the Obama Treasury and
Department of Justice have responded to the various lawsuits brought by GSE common
and preferred stock holders.
Those investors tend to believe that Treasury’s decision to significantly
change the original 2008 F&F 10% dividend debt repayment rules—and instead sweep every penny the two earn-- violates
the Constitution. The shareholders think it also exposes F&F to unnecessary
risk, despite their recent business revenue gains, since nothing the two earn
stays with them for critical capital protection. (Even some HBC Republicans
expressed concern over that fact.)
I written about this financial pillage, regularly, because the DoJ and
Treasury tactics appear less about holding close sensitive financial business information/data
but more about hiding senior government officials’ gaffs, political mistakes, or
flawed financial calculations, starting when US Treasury officials likely aggrandized
statutory power the Congress gave exclusively to the F&F regulator—the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)--and
circumvented or broke the law to do so.
I believe the documents are being covered up or withheld because they reveal
Treasury big-footing FHFA into giving over its exclusive F&F conservatorship
authority to Treasury. Disclosure could moot that which followed, including the
sweep, not to mention make some people look really stupid.
S-o-o-o-o-o-o!
Ms. Morgenson, doing more work in her column than most congressional
committee staffs would do, helpfully has listed a raft of specific documents that the Obama Treasury
has been withholding/hiding through claims of “executive privilege,”
hypocritically suggesting the docs are so sensitive to the nation/world’s
markets that disclosure--of these seven year old notes, emails, press releases,
and memos--could cause financial/economic disaster. (Excuse me, but at this juncture,
blog readers now may engage in spirited, hilarious, stomach busting, ridiculous
laughter aimed at certain Obama officials!)
Here is the capper for Jeb’s week. Wait for it, wait for
it….
I would suggest Ms. Morgenson—in addition to highlighting a story which
needs more harsh media scrutiny--presented a premiere opportunity for the House
Banking Committee to see that new subpoena authority it bestowed on Chairman Hensarling.
They should insist he demands the Obama Admin Treasury/FHFA/F&F
send those enumerated documents to his committee for its scrutiny, “right #)&*$%# now.”
(Cue the brass, the William Tell overture--Texas remember--and the Ride of the Valkyries.)
Let the White House tussle with the “rootin-tootin” Chairman of the House
Banking Committee, not just Federal Judge Margaret Sweeney, over reports and
communications it claims are too sensitive/secret for our gentle ears.
I hope people finally will see this Administration’s CYA antics and
understand why many believe Obama and some of his cohorts have treated F&F like
red headed step children.
Jeb’s committee can opine if the Treasury played fast and loose with
the laws in 2012, possibly breaking some, one, a few?
Why would Jeb do it?
Simple, so he can embarrass the same Jack Lew/US Treasury officials
he’s trying to drill politically with his SEC threats. Likely they are same
senior crew of advisors and officials hiding the F&F political and policy
mistakes.
Since none of the said acts happened on Mel Watt’s turf, the House
Banking Committee--the part which would care--wouldn’t be embarrassing their
former colleague Mr. Watt, who still was a Committee member in 2012, not head
of FHFA when said indiscretion occurred. (That honor belongs to Ed DeMarco.)
If Hensarling doesn’t want to undertake this task, others might
consider it, maybe SBC Chairman Dick Shelby (R-Ala.) would or possibly Sen
Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) or Senate Finance Chair Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Finance’s
Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) or even Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), just to name a few.
If Jeb or any of these aforementioned public officials take up the
cudgels, they should thank Gretchen Morgenson for providing a lighted path.
Thanks, Gretchen.
What Others are Saying
The President: Let’s send Castro up to testify, he’s ready, right,
right, uh guys…..? (From Inside Mortgage Finance)
By George Brooks
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Secretary Julian Castro faced the wrath of the GOP majority during a House
Financial Services Committee hearing this week on the state of the FHA,
focusing in particular on the agency’s recent decision to cut annual mortgage
insurance premiums.
While Castro may have been warned
about stepping into the lion’s den, he appeared ill-prepared for the
confrontation with Republicans, unable to answer basic questions such as FHAs
net income, overall delinquency rate and the serious delinquency rate for 2014.
Democrats,
on the other hand, helped the embattled secretary regain his footing by
expressing support for FHAs efforts and putting perspective on some of FHAs
actions to strengthen the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund and help qualify more
borrowers for FHA credit.
Josh Rosner in “Value
Walk”
______________________________________________________________________
Fannie Mae earnings???
The Washington Post reports that GSE earnings could occur this coming Friday, 2-20-2015, although
no firm dates ever are announced by F&F. So maybe 2014 4Q earnings this
week or maybe not.
______________________________________________
Alcee
and the “Dildo State”
Congressman Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) colorfully disses
Texas.
Civil
Rights letter
Several times I have mentioned, but not run a copy of the
letter, supporting Fannie and Freddie, sent to FHFA by a number major civil
rights groups. (See below.)
___________________________________________________________
Washington, J. Adams, Jefferson, Monroe, J.Q. Adams and all the rest……...
Happy Presidents’ Day!!
Maloni, 2-16-2015
Bill -If US Security is at issue with the release of the documents- How come the Congress has not been informed? Indeed Congress: They should insist and demand demand the Obama Admin Treasury/FHFA/F&F send those enumerated documents to his committee for its scrutiny.
ReplyDeleteDuncan--For the most part, these documents/reports/memos, etc. are 4-6 years old. They are not sensitive or commercially revealing.
ReplyDeleteI doubt there are any operational or business data there which could produce financial/economic catastrophes, if released.
But, as I wrote and have written, I am willing to bet they contain lots of embarrassing political and personal faux pas.
Trust me, if those docs identified by Morgenson ever got sent to the Hill, they would show up in the media in a heartbeat.
Good post Bill.
ReplyDeleteAgreed, Congress should perform their oversight responsibility here. If use of Presidential Privilege doesn't get their attention, what would!? Checks and balances...??
I sent GM's article to members of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees...as well as to numerous others...
We've had the Big Mo for the last several weeks, but GM's article is a turbo boost!
FoF--Thanks for reading and writing.
ReplyDeleteI agree very much. I hope it would "interest" others in the media to look into it, as well.
It's the Banking guys who might react fastest to outside overtures, since it's there committee jurisdiction and some, yet, may not have been co-opted into believing, like fire, "F&F bad!"
FYI, the Admin could hide behind Exec Privilege and stonewall the Hill, too, but that would be more of what the doctor ordered.
I always assumed the Republicans are not going to pursue any actions against the illegalities, because they are secretly wishing that they would inherit the conservatorship back, and so it would therefore be counterproductive to call the administration out on it.
ReplyDeleteAt the same time, it is such a juicy political opportunity that it is hard to pass up. Besides what are the chances that a Republican administration could inherit the sweep in tact.
That is why the quicker we expose it, the more pressure the Republicans will feel to act on it, instead of hoping they could also benefit from a piece of the pie themselves.
So, basically the consolation prize in this case would be to make Obama look bad...
So, they are torn.
Thanks as usual, Mr. Maloni.
ReplyDeleteJohn S--Thanks for your comment. Also note I wasn't just playing "pin the tail on the GOP" with my suggestion.
ReplyDeleteIf the House (or Senate R's) engage on this there will be more attention, discussion and media; any docs sent to the Hill never will stay under wraps and the information in them--which will be far more political than commerce--will be out within days if not hours.
That's part of the Admin's current slow walk strategywith Judge Sweeney.
I don't think very many people on the Hill are thinking about GOP inheritance of
conservatorship and what that might mean, if they are thinking about it at all.
__________________________________
Joe--Thank you for reading and writing.
Bill, I would like you to know that alot of people in UT are reading your blog. I have sent an artical to Sen Orin Hatch's office. I am going to send the GM artical to Mia Love as well. Thank you for all you have done the last 7 years I have been following you.
ReplyDeleteRobert--Thanks for connecting and your comment.
ReplyDeleteAs you know Ms. Love is a freshman/woman) on the House Banking Committee and Senator Hatch chairs Senate Finance, so two good people to get interested in the GM article as well as this subject.
One for you RH is that Freddie Mac has a number of LDS links including former Chairmen of the old Home Loan Bank Board--which was Freddie's formal board before it went "private in 1979--and several early Freddie officials were Mormon, as well.
Mr Maloni .. it looks like you've made more friends than our ole pal Wallison at a right wing 3 ring AEI book give'n away'n function'n (disclaimer for all them AEI free book receivers ... Ya Get what Ya Pay For)
ReplyDeleteThanks for all you do!
keep it up and ya never know you might just get yer very own tee shirt too ...
Thanks, Mr F, you silver tongued old guitar player.
ReplyDeleteBut, I am curious how you know so much about how many friends PW has, let alone what my narrow popularity might be?