May
you all have a happy Memorial Day, 2015;
special blessings go out to everyone--and their immediate families and
progeny--who served our nation in the armed forces, especially those who made
the ultimate sacrifice and gave their lives. We forever will owe you.
Shelby,
etc. Don’t Underestimate Him
Congress has departed for its Memorial Day holiday, but the
Senate Banking Committee, chaired by Dick Shelby (R-Ala.) -- on a party line
vote (12-10)--left behind a steaming, smelly mess, which requires someone to
clean up.
Who will it be?
Logical candidates are the Senate D’s, the White House, the
media, "Fannie Gate patrons," or nobody?
Oh ,and a warning to you folks back home--also known as
citizens and constituents--remember to lock your front and back doors, take in
the small children, the elderly, your animals, Aunt Bessie, Uncle Fred, Cousin
Delilah, and closely watch any of those politicians if they come near your
neighborhoods (although many will be traveling on “fact finding missions” to
exotic international places). Those visiting pols still might lie and bamboozle
you, which you easily can tell if you see their lips move.
SBC
Last Week
In an action cheered only by the institutions which
benefited, Shelby and his committee posse removed some federal financial regulation
from bank holding companies with assets between $$51 Billion and $499 Billion
(current regulatory practices has eyes on anything below $500 Billion) and also
made various Fannie and Freddie changes, which should make it easier for these
same big banks to swallow the F&F operations, if Shelby and his boys,
notably Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) complete their goal of dismantling F&F,
which currently provides structure and overall management of the nation’s
primary and secondary mortgage markets.
The Competitive
Enterprise Institute’s John Breslau grasped the same
linkage I did, when I blogged against this bill, mid-last week. The Libertarian think tank saw the Shelby
language as an undesirable statutory highway to add—at some future point—last
year’s failed CorkerWarnerJohnsonCrapo (CWJC) GSE legislation.
That concern stopped nobody—because they were feasting on
screwing with the Fed and satisfying the big banks--and the SBC Republicans
plowed forward and voted out the Shelby bill—with no Democrat votes-- vowing
that it needs additional work before it could be brought the Senate floor
later this year. (An understatement
ranking with, “Hey General Custer, do those look like Indians out there?”)
How do you like these "apples?"
Bank
fines in the past 7 years; Why Senate action was so wrong
The links below list some major bank fines paid in the past
few years. (Excuse any news report
overlap or duplication)
I'm certain I missed some roguish financial services behavior, law
breaking and reg busting fines; but note the variety of sanctioned bank violations:
--manipulating the London Interbank Borrowing Rate (LIBOR),
to which most US adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) are indexed (and lenders want
you to take);
--violating the Service
Members Relief Act;
--deceiving and selling billions of dollars’ worth of corrupted
mortgage backed securities to Fannie and Freddie;
--laundering money for Mexican drug cartels;
--business engagements with Middle Eastern extremist political
and business interests, supporting entities in conflict with US foreign and
defense policies;
--withholding bond revenue which should have been dispensed
to bond investors;
--wrongful residential foreclosures and evictions;
--defrauding/misleading investors by withholding key
investment information;
--cornering precious metal markets; price fixing;
--and rigging the Euro-Dollar exchange rate.
To GOP
members of the Senate Banking Committee members, please THINK?
Why do
these banking interests and their TBTF brethren—which have deceit and anti-consumer
corner cutting running through their institutional DNA—want you to create fewer
federal eyes on them rather than more?
Thanks to my good friend and former colleague Gwenn Hibbs
for sharing this recent Atlantic Monthly
article discussing a Notre Dame University survey of financial services
employees
Almost a quarter
of finance professionals surveyed have witnessed illegal conduct, and 50
percent of those with <10 caught.="" experience="" get="" happily="" if="" insider="" laws="" nbsp="" o:p="" t="" they="" trading="" violate="" would="" wouldn="" yrs.="">
Read Jena
McGregor’s Wash Post story about the same ND study.
Better yet is
this colorful and so accurate column from the British newspaper Independent by Andrew Newsom. (Thanks to Mr. F for sending it to me.)
The Senate GOP Needs to Answer
We all know, it’s
in the banking industry’s charlatan blood and lineage to cheat. Banks have bamboozled
and have gotten caught. But, they’ll continue to be larcenous because the fines
are bubkis when compared with their corporate
profits.
So, why do the
Senate R’s think the changes they made in the Shelby bill will slow down bank trickery and are
good for the American people, who always are the losers when these big fat cat
bankers screw up?
And please don’t
throw out the old saw about “helping them better compete against foreign
banks,” which is total BS.
How’s this? Put Them Behind Bars
Fines, no matter
the size, won’t stop this industry banditry, but jail time might slow it down and, if severe enough, stop it.
The $5.7 Billion
paid last week by five banks admitting guilt in the Dollar-Euro hijinks, was
about 23 days profits for this group. Start putting in the slammer those who
were caught and we might find some consistently honest bankers out there,
especially among the big guys who haven’t always been.
and,
Shelby/Corker and the GSEs
In last weeks’ steps
making it easier for large banks to do whatever they want in contravention of
federal regulatory policies, the Senate Republicans, obeying their GSE guru
Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), also limited the government’s ability to use its
GSE preferred stock warrants to restructure F&F or alter some of the
“Conservatorship” rules. (See, again,
Breslau article above.)
Breslau and others
on both the Libertarian/conservative side of the political spectrum get it; banks are not worthy stewards of the
nation’s mortgage finance system, but that exactly is the end game in the GOP
crush F&F and let the banks decide who gets what home mortgage loan and how
much they pay for it.
Part of me things the Senate R’s are
desperate to stop Mel Watt and FHFA from carrying out any administrative
reforms, hence the language in Shelby.
The American
public doesn’t trust large financial institutions nor should the Congress put
all of its mortgage eggs in one major industry basket which is why this GOP
drive pell-mell exercise to destroy F&F makes little sense relative to the American
public’s home mortgage needs/desires.
It’s Hardly Over....
Admittedly, the
Shelby language may or may not survive the Senate floor debate, a conference,
or a presidential veto. But, that hardly means it should be dismissed, since I can
easily constrict a scenario where Shelby—if some of the more egregious bank reg
relief is dropped and more honey/sugar added—could attract some D’s, with its
current or even more anti-F&F proposal in it, and get through that chamber.
Policy makers
need to look at what mortgage system elements the Corker changes (in the Shelby
bill) are setting up and that’s when this part of the exercise should fall
through or collapse of its own weight.
Corker is trying
desperately to work the big banks into the process of F&F developing a
Common Securitization Platform (CSP) and a single F&F mortgage backed
security (with the Fannie bond the model since it trades better than the
Freddie counterpart, because of structure and cash flow).
It seems to me
that Corker and whomever helps him are seeking ways to take advantage of GSE
resources for his bank buddies and leverage F&F out of their business and
current roles.
A major cautionary
word to those who might see Shelby’s 12-10 all GOP votes akin to last year’s
Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) “Path Act” legislation, which got Democrat meager but a
majority of votes, and then died. Don’t light up your victory cigars.
Shelby is many times
the political player as Hensarling; don’t miscalculate and underrate the senior
Senator from Alabama.
Stegman, CSP, Single Security and Deposition
Mike Stegman’s
move from Treasury counselor to the WH
(which I am told by legal sources won’t
shield him from being deposed, if that’s what Third Amendment plaintiff’s
lawyers seek) reportedly is a step to
give him authority to drive the current
CSP and single security exercises
toward the non-F&F users. (A move which I think should anger Mel Watt
and his allies. Are you listening CBC and Ms. Jarret?)
Every mortgage alternative
to the current F&F model (Bipartisan Commission, CWJC, and the Jeb
Hensarling, banks only approach) has major flaws, as does the plain transition
from one mortgage paradigm to another. But the congressional and Treasury
rocket scientists are loathe to explore the one approach that can be near
seamless and without chaos and massive disruption and that, simply, is making
minimal changes in the GSE model and moving forward with recapitalization.
They seem intent
on doing away with the GSEs—which in the mortgage world act as a governor on
the major banks worst inclinations—shouting abuses at the old “business model”
and seeking an ill-defined alternative.
I believe an
honest poll of mortgage industry stakeholders, including the American consumer,
overwhelmingly would support sprucing up what we have, which is easily done as
Jim Millstein and others, including those advocating for F&F as utilities)
have proposed.
Why is that simple voyage such a
scary odyssey for many politicians?
GSE Courts Cases
One hope I have
is to see—finally—an honest account of why the GSEs were put into
conservatorship.
It exists, between
the “GOP’s get F&F ideology”, Obama’s the “government needs money and
F&F are cash cow candidates”, Treasury was “stressed so it bent/broke the
HERA law,” and government officials totally and willfully misread the F&F
functional market role and didn’t understand the government’s forced changes
(both “conservatorship” and “Third Amendment”) would reap mortgage market
anger, confusion, lawsuits, and bitterness.
I have theories
but none of which can accurately cut through what I hope will be emerging
facts, coming out of the miasma in the Sweeney and Lamberth—if it ever gets
successfully appealed—court hearings/decisions.
What Others Are Saying
Speaking at a journalism awards dinner last week in
Minneapolis, the NYT’s Gretchen
Morgenson slammed the Obama Administration for its secrecy, after the
President promised he would preside over the most transparent White House in
recent memory.
__________________________________________________________
The National
Communicate Reinvestment Corporation’s John
Taylor comments on the Shelby bill.
http://www.realestaterama.com/2015/05/22/ncrc-statement-on-shelby-regulatory-relief-bill-committee-vote-ID027117.html
on-shelby-regulatory-relief-bill-committee-vote-ID027117.html#sthash.bAAp0PG1.dpuf
____________________________________________________________
The Brits see the bank problem, too. See Will
Hutton’s column in the “Guardian.”
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/24/criminal-bankers-brazenly-milk-system-change-it
_________________________________________________________
Maloni,
5-25-2015
yeezy
ReplyDeleteretro jordans
kyrie 6
kd 12
adidas yeezy
kd12
yeezy supply
kawhi leonard shoes
off white jordan 1
golden goose outlet
longchamp
ReplyDeleteair jordan
off white nike
retro jordans
lebron shoes
curry shoes
supreme
chrome hearts store
jordan 12
nike kyrie 6