Pre-Christmas
Observations
Kudos
Mel Watt
(See segment's final paragraph)
In the middle of last week a number of reports suggested
that Fannie and Freddie took actions to drive up the cost of mortgage finance
with a loan level pricing (LLP) fee increase which most expect lenders will pass on to borrowers.
Accurate as far as it goes, but it wasn’t Fannie and Freddie doing this. Once again it was actions
driven by their regulator who mandated the boost.
This was another dictate from on high from the outgoing
DeMarco regime and his posse, still holding senior Federal Housing Finance Agency
(FHFA) jobs.
It’s been written about--and all but verified--that Ed DeMarco
was conflicted by his role as “conservator,” under the 2008 HERA legislation,
and as F&F’s regulatory overseer.
His HERA assignment was to “conserve” and to resuscitate
F&F and preserve/foster their assets; but his second job—the one apparently
closer to his heart where he could exercise discretion—was working with his
team, divining ways he could wind down Fannie and Freddie and limit their
capacity to gain strength and generate revenue, all in the guise of “bringing
more private capital into the mortgage market.” (Hey, nobody can be against that, right?)
But, he failed
there, as succeeded wonderfully, supported the nation’s mortgage finance system
and became burgeoning cash cows, to the
point—as most everyone knows---that in a few short weeks, when 4Q 2013 earnings
are announced, Fannie and Freddie will have more than paid back the money the
taxpayers invested in them.
Anyone who talks to officials at Fannie and Freddie know
the two are being told what to do; F&F senior execs are not managing their
companies and making any significant decisions.
They are automatons, taking and implementing orders from
FHFA and, occasionally, from Treasury.
There is hope among some that Mel Watt, once he is sworn
in, will breathe life into the two’s historic mortgage finance role and have
them initiate—Shh, can I say compete?—and
pass on those benefits to US home buyers and the mortgage finance system
broadly.
But, to be effective, Watt should root out FHFA
reactionaries, who support the DeMarco approach.
He should bring in a strong “Watt team,” who truly understand
the mortgage and securities markets and how the principals interact. They have
to total allegiance to Watt and no fidelity—until it’s earned under fire--to
the carryover FHFA staff, who likely will have little love for a new Director
more inclined to help mortgagors.
I’ll repeat what I’ve written before, after being sworn
in new Director Watt might find them comfortable, but I doubt Watt can find
anyone working on Capitol Hill who has the requisite skills he’ll need at his
right hand.
In the meantime, industry groups are pushing the Hill to
push FHFA (Watt) to roll back the loan level pricing adjustments and I hope he
does.
(The
preceding segment was written on Friday afternoon, Dec. 20. On Friday night, Mr. Watt announced that he
would delay the fee increases until he could review their impact. Congrats
industry groups and others who pushed for that decision.)
AEI Looks Overseas and Sees???
Last week, I noted that Ed Pinto
will head a new American Enterprise Institute (AEI) international housing
finance operation.
Here is there press announcement and
a brief AEI produced description of Ed’s new shop.
“Today, the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) launches a
new initiative to help temper the destructive boom/bust cycles in housing
markets: the AEI International Center on Housing Risk (ICHR). The ICHR will
equip borrowers, investors, analysts, regulators, politicians, and lenders with
new indices designed to provide transparent measures of housing market risks
and the means to mitigate these risks and instill market discipline. It
will be staffed by nearly two dozen experts, many of whom warned of the crisis
from which we are still recovering.”
But, what can the nation—and the world—look for in this new
project? I hope the work is a lot better than the last time that Ed and Peter
Wallison, his AEI colleague, got on their “research” tear.
That was when they produced and huckstered Ed’s distorted funky finding that Fannie Mae bought mostly subprime loans in the 1990's, which provided the Rightwing movement plenty of
grist for their mantra that "Fannie and Freddie caused the 2008 financial
meltdown.”
But it was a hollow theory which serious researchers panned
and one which got rejected across the board by many government and private reviewers.
Most egregious was Peter Wallison attempt to flog Pinto’s
work—when Peter Wallison served as a member of
President Obama’s Financial
Inquiry Commission, most egregious was PW’s effort to flog Pinto’s work to the
Commission staff and mislead some in Congress about how Pinto’s product was
received. (Hint; the FCIC staff dumped all over it, as did the Federal Reserve
staff in a special report to the FCIC. In short order, so did a Nobel prize
economist, several national financial writers, and our friend and colleague,
David Fiderer.)
So, as kind of a “welcome back to the research world Ed
Pinto,” let’s revisit what some people said the last time Ed and Peter wrapped
their names around some of Ed’s personal research.
Here is a 2011 story from the Daily Kos.
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2011/04/15/967275/-Why-Isn-t-FCIC-Commissioner-Peter-Wallison-Facing-Criminal-Prosecution-After-He-Lied-To-Congress
Here is David Min’s superb and substantive rejection of the AEI line.
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/07/why-wallison-is-wrong-about-the-genesis-of-the-u-s-housing-crisis/
Bob Kuttner in the American Prospect.
http://prospect.org/cs/articles?article=fanniebackwards
Here is Paul Krugman’s work in the NYT.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/14/fannie-freddie-phooey/?partner=bloomberg
Here is a New York Times blog book review of the Gretchen Morgenson and Josh Rosner’s book, which relied heavily on Pinto’s research.
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/jul/13/why-fannie-and-freddie-are-not-blame-crisis/
This Huffington Post link contains the most detailed description of what reportedly was in the Fed memo sent to the FCIC, as well as Wallison’s admission of leaking it to Pinto.
More:
--Columbia
Journalism Review website. http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/rubio_and_the_big_lie_of_the_c.php
“Read this
piece by David Fiderer, who calls out the
American Enterprise Institute’s Edward Pinto, who along with Peter Wallison,
has been the primary force behind the Big
Lie, noting how he has recently taken in The New York Times, the Los
Angeles Times, and others with misleading claims about the Federal Housing
Administration.”
--Mike Konczal, a fellow with the Roosevelt
Institute
Wonkblog: No,
Marco Rubio, government did not cause the housing crisis
(Maloni note: Konczal's piece also references previous
rejections of the AEI/Pinto/Wallison charges.)
--Jesse Eisinger
--Barry
Ritholz
--Paul Krugman
--Ken
Harney
Nick
Timiraos, WSJ
Mortgages, Ed
Pinto, and a vast conspiracy of silence http://www.opednews.com/articles/Mortgages-Ed-Pinto-And-A-by-David-Fiderer-130213-6.html
…“Check out that first chart. Hilarious stuff.”
The world needs to remember Ed Pinto’s and AEI’s first major foray into
housing research and keep it in mind, if similar fetid analysis—with an
international flavor--pours from the AEI well.
“Fool me once, shame
on you; fool me twice, shame on me!”
2013 and 2014
I wish you and yours, all, a healthy, happy
holiday season and an equally healthy, happy and productive New Year.
May the saner minds in Congress and in the financial
services world emerge and shine in 2014
Maloni, 12-21-2013
4 comments:
A Happy New Year to you as well.
Thank you for all your help, insight, links, perspective.
A Happy New Year to you as well.
Thank you all your insight, perspective and links.
Bill I can't find an email for you ...
you can reach me at ....
mrfidlsticks@gmail.com
I'll be watching for something from you
supreme shirt
irving shoes
kyrie irving shoes
kd 13
nike off white
supreme new york
cheap jordans
kyrie 3
moncler outlet
kyrie irving shoes
Post a Comment