Good
earnings, nice comeback, but..
Once again, the mortgage “Terrific/Terrible Twins” financially/systemically
came through for the nation and its taxpayers, ticketing another $8.5 Billion
for Treasury in September (when the actual “sweep” occurs) with their recent
quarterly revenue announcements.
The two reversed some early in the year hedging losses
and benefited from a better interest rate environment and business volumes.
The thing to remember is F&F produced, provided deep liquidity and succeeded. There are ways to sustain that operational and systemic accomplishment—not
through disruption and partisan chaos and not by doing away with them--just
release and recapitalize the two.
It’s not nice to chortle over the good news, but I will employing what
others said at the expense of two professional naysayers.
As Investors Unite,
headed by investor Tim Pagliara, articulated about the GSE financial performance
in the last quarter……
“That strong outlook….. must surely be a shock to some of the
naysayers who predicted that the GSEs would not be profitable, chief among them
Mortgage Bankers CEO Dave Stevens and Treasury’s Michael Stegman, who is
counselor to the Secretary for housing finance policy.”
Or, as my grandkids (and I) might say to
Stevens and Stegman, “natty, natty boo, boo!”
Freddie Q2 earnings:
Fannie Q2 earnings:
Don’t forget to remind Rep. Ed
Royce (R-Cal), too, what the GSEs just achieved.
The
GSEs still need help
As we all have come to learn—and rue--good
financial news, which should track
equally good mortgage origination new through the end of this year, doesn’t
mean a thing unless some federal judge somewhere supports the GSEs and
plaintiffs in their 2008 Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) and “Third
Amendment” lawsuits.
In a new development, last
week the US Court of Appeals has asked the Delaware Court to look at whether
the Third Amendment “sweep” sweep violates Delaware state law-- as former
Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Myron Steele--declared in an amicus pieces
filed by Center for Individual Freedom…….. (See Todd Sullivan’s
article in ValuePlays.)
Even a positive opinion in Delaware that
the “sweep” breaks state law, won’t necessarily facilitate federal proceedings,
but it certainly would be better for the cause than a poke in the eye with a
sharp stick!
I’ll repeat my belief that President Obama,
even beleaguered as he is and losing the confidence of middle income Americans,
won’t release and/or recapitalize Fannie and Freddie before he leaves office.
I just don’t think that move is in BHO’s
political DNA. (Maybe he can look at last
week’s NAR report on falling homeownership and see a linkage?)
Senator
Chuck Schumer
I emailed my thanks to Sen.
Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) office last week for his timely and bold opposition
to the Iran deal, a pact I believe is quite flawed (as I wrote weeks ago in the
blog)—but fixable, even if John Kerry drives the negotiations car.
Any deal, which fails to allow UN inspectors into any site,
anywhere in Iran—unannounced—is not a good deal.
Yes, Iran, face it, “the Great Satan” doesn’t trust
you—or your proxy military cabals, either--and why should we?
Get over it, “You done bad to/by us” and the American
people are pissed.
The Ayatollah’s acolytes screaming “Death to America” and
“Death to Israel,” while he discusses the deal, is not exactly a warm “Welcome
Wagon greetins!”
Unlimited access to possible nuclear weapons sites is the
price you should pay to get the sanctions rolled back and your financial assets
thawed and made available to you.
GOP Presidential
Debate; What I thought
The event was very entertaining, most candidates having something
he/she can point to that was distinctive. Maybe I was the only one, but the
only discomfit I detected was between the three Fox network hosts—who asked excellent questions—but didn’t see too comfortable
with one another. I don’t know if they were competing, just their chemistry seemed
feigned.
Donald
“Icarus” Trump. Did he fly too close to the sun when he
disrespected Megyn Kelly? We’ll soon find out.
GSEs only came up during the earlier “kids session” (seven candidates
who didn’t make the top 10) when Carly Fiorina mentioned F&F.
However, that was a harbinger. You can expect GOP
candidates, regularly, to malign Fannie and Freddie more often, because both
names have become Republican or code for how the Democrats or Washington has
screwed up. Even though most of the real damage was done under former President
George W. Bush, while the past six years of problem-free mortgage business
success happened under the Obama Administration.
Few of the “GOP 17”
really know or understand F&F or how mortgage finance works. It’s like a juvenile
using a catchy foreign language verb or noun. Employing the names “Fannie and
Freddie” sound cool and it appeals that way to their friends, too, who then use
it hoping to sound just as cool or “with it.” But, beyond spewing the polemic,
none rise above and offer workable policy alternatives based on consumer or
mortgage market needs.
GOP
Debate Specifics
I loved Trump’s first answer that unless he liked/respected
the GOP candidate--if it wasn’t him--he wouldn't guarantee he would support
the person. Little doubt everything revolved around Donald on debate night and
will for many weeks to come. He’s the one monkey that makes the show!
Trump, himself, may be one, but his answer was declaring, “Most of
these individuals are Lilliputians and I’m not going to support one I don’t
think is up to the job.”
The GOP and the media lionized Trump and his message—which
several on the stage shared—his misogyny is another thing. But, I doubt the
Donald drops that quality. He sounds as if he has doubled down.
Now let’s see if the GOP has the institutional gonads to
kill his candidacy or freeze him out knowing that most people tuned into Fox last
week just to see him perform.
And...
Gov. John Kasich came across as honest and sincere, but a
little unpolished. (For the record, when
Kasich bragged about being “the House Budget Chair who worked on the first
balanced budget,” etc., the head of OMB in that era-- (and for two consecutive balanced
budgets--was Bill Clinton’s Budget
Director Frank Raines, who returned to Fannie later as its CEO.)
I thought Chris Christie helped himself; Best lines went to
Dr. Ben Carson (“Why would I discuss race, I am a brain surgeon” and when he
noted his experience removing half a brain from a patient and then suggesting--given
what happens in Washington--someone else accomplished that same thing). Huckabee’s
send up—of what everyone thought was assumed was Trump—but brought major laughs
from plain inhaling when he threw out Hillary’s name, instead. Jeb didn’t hurt
himself, but didn’t help himself.
I didn’t think Ted Cruz did well, nor do I believe Marco
Rubio did as well as many others seem to think. He looked too young and lacked
sincerity.
Not surprisingly, President Obama took lots of hits,
especially over the Iran deal. (Sen Chuck Schumer (D-NY.) coming out against
the pact on debate night didn’t help BHO, either. But I am glad that Schumer did.)
“Fort
Shelby” gun fire not aimed at “Dick!”
There is no truth to the rumor that gunshots fired at
Mississippi’s military camp “Fort Shelby” last week came from an
angry GSE-advocate, showing his disdain for Senator Dick Shelby (R-Ala.), who’s been screwing around with legislation
negatively impacting the GSEs.
After my extensive research, I can report the Senator has
no known familial ties to the camp. Camp Shelby was established in 1917. The
post was named in honor of Isaac Shelby, Indian fighter, Revolutionary War hero and 1st Governor
of Kentucky, by the first troops to train there.
_______________________________________
What Others Are Saying
OMB’s Shawn Donovan objects to Senate
appropriations bill and the “Shelby bill amendment” it contains.
Urban Institute says mortgage credit still tough to get.
http://www.urban.org/urban-wire/its-still-too-hard-most-americans-get-mortgage?utm_source=iContact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Housing
Finance Update&utm_content=HFPC+Update+-+8%2F4%2F2015
If the FHFA and the White
House puppeteers removed some of the GSE constraints that situation will
change. But someone downtown must make the connection. The blinders most of
them wear when it comes to conventional mortgage-- finance and freeing the
GSEs--prohibit that nexus.
Dunderheads; just believe in your own
regulatory success since 2008 and free Fannie and Freddie, just a little bit.
The Washington Post
has two positive mortgage pieces in last week, an op ed and a letter to the
editor.
Al Sharpton’s op ed in Wash Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/08/03/sharpton-lets-act-now-to-give-everyone-a-chance-at-homeownership-and-the-american-dream/
*************************************************
W Post Letter to Editor
Misunderstanding
the Mortgage Crisis
August 3 at 5:19 PM
In his July 29
letter, “Stop blaming big
banks,”
Robert E. Long claimed “we now know” that the mortgage crisis was caused by a
lowering of mortgage loan standards by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to meet
the politically motivated housing goals mandated by the Clinton and George W.
Bush administrations. There is nothing new about this hypothesis; it was
considered, along with several other explanations, by the members of the
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, whose report was submitted to the
president in January 2011.
Of the 10 members of
the commission, only one, Peter J. Wallison, took the extreme position Mr. Long
holds. Of the four members appointed by the Republican congressional
leadership, three rejected the idea that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by
themselves caused the crisis, as did the six members appointed by the
Democratic leadership.
Jim Taylor,
Alexandria
Banking News to Warm Bankers Hearts
Rising bank profits, rising Exec pay
________________________________________________
By John Bancroft
A broad sample of 25 publicly traded banks reported strong
earnings from their mortgage-banking operations during the second quarter of
2015, a new Inside Mortgage Trends analysis reveals.
The group, which includes the four megabanks and the major
regionals involved in the sector, reported a combined $4.391 billion in
mortgage-banking income for the second quarter. That was up 19.6 percent from
the first quarter of this year, and it marked the group’s strongest profits in
over two years.
Back in the first quarter of 2013, these 25 institutions
racked up $6.876 billion in mortgage-banking income in what was one of the most
profitable quarters ever for the industry.
At the midway
point of 2015, the group’s $8.061 billion in year-to-date mortgage-banking
income was up 15.1 percent from the first six months of 2014. For further
analysis and an exclusive table on the mortgage earnings of the group, see the
new edition of Inside Mortgage Trends, now available online.
****************************************************************
And breaking news from England which might cool the bankers’
hearts!
UK—First LIBOR Prison Term
Maybe I should rewrite this article in small words, using
big print, so the DoJ, SEC, Fed, Comptroller, and FDIC can understand it.
____________________________________________________________
As Chuck Schumer pushes President Obama one way, Yahoo reports, interestingly, former senior Israel security/military
officials push the other way against Bibi Netanyahu.
Maloni,
8-10-2015
8 comments:
I don't think that the US ct of appeals (DC Circuit) would issue a one sentence order to suspend the schedule in order to ask DE for their input without some explanation. It's possible, but doesn't seem likely. Another theory is that they did so in order to ask Judge Lamberth to reconsider. It remains a mystery why they suspended the schedule (possibly in response to something Cooper filed on July 29th).
Wayne--Quien Sabe?
Just showing off my fluency in French by asking "who knows!" ;-)
(OK, I know it's Spanish, but it's summer tme!!!)
But then, the appeals court may have also issued an explanation for the "Lamberth" case scenario or even for the excuse of having received thousands of documents they must now include in the case. The one most certain explanation of why they issued a one-sentence order without further explaining the why it's because they may have a strong reason to keep that reason, whatever it is, away from public eyes.
The question to ask then is which of the 3 explanations MUST be kept away from public scrutiny:
1. Delaware input.
2. Lamberth reconsideration.
3. Court being overwhelmed by new documents.
Which one of the three would be the most explosive one?
My answer is 2-1-3 in that order.
Ceteris paribus, I agree with you.
I am going to have to go back and see "Tombstone," the Wyatt Earp movie, where Doc Holliday (Val Kilmer) quotes Latin to "Johnny Ringo" to defuse a little barroom mess, "In vino veritas."
"In wine there is truth," agitates Doc.
Nice Blog ...
Brisa de verano , me hace sentir bien
Soplando a través de los jazmines en mi mente
Brisa de verano , me hace sentir bien
Soplando a través de los jazmines en mi mente
Muchas gracias, poco palyer guitar.
(Mr Sticks is a popular guitar player in his hood!)
Post a Comment