Today, We All Are Charlie Hebdo
And, Unfortunately, We All are France
We can’t take any solace that Muslim
zealots struck in France, because the United States faces many of the same
challenges and risks. We have our own sizeable Muslim population in the US and
possibly a few of them are ISIS sympathetic or worse.
We also are home to lots of our own non-Muslim
fanatics and true believers
The Paris events were despicable
acts carried out by religiously zealots motivated by hatred. Someone will try
to ape the French atrocities and, likely, there might be copycat killings and
what better country to generate the publicity radical religionists crave than
the United States, the original Muslim “Great Satan?”
The French Muslim killers used
military weapons rare in Europe but easy to acquire in the US. Two months ago I
had those thoughts, long before last week’s attack on the satirical magazine
and the kosher deli, when my sons took me to a Las Vegas shooting gallery and
we fired a variety of historic and contemporary automatic weapons, all
of which were for sale
in the adjoining gun store.
As a nation and people, we need to
stay alert and mindful crap can and does happen here.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Now batting, President Barack Obama…..
As most baseball fans know, you get
three strikes and you are out. You can hit a dozen foul balls, but if you swing
and miss or the umpire calls a pitch a “strike,” you are done until a future at
bat.
When it comes to Fannie and Freddie issues,
Barack Obama seems to get about a dozen pitches—swinging and missing at most of
those—yet he stays at home plate still flailing away, still nearly hitless
and the pitches keep coming.
It’s not crafty GOP hurler throwing
it past him, but his own self-created tableaus where he gets the pitch he wants
but still whiffs. (Think of your uncle or your father throwing you batting practice.)
Dropping the baseball metaphor, take last week’s much touted Obama speech in Phoenix (“Please,” as Groucho Marx or Henny Youngman might have said—look them up, kids!).
Admin news leaks set up the world to
expect some executive action (there’s
that phrase, again, which means it doesn’t require the Congress to acquiesce)
cutting FHA insurance premiums and the President didn’t disappoint; he
announced a collective 50 basis points (a half percent) FHA front end fee cut.
Strike Five
The GOP—those that noticed--hissed
and booed as the “housers” cheered. But if BHO’s Phoenix speech, reducing FHA
costs, helped Thursday’s 325 point stock market surge—as a few industry folks suggested--just
think what would happen if the President announced he was freeing F&F from conservatorship??
That directive would have significantly
driven
up homebuyer and system user
expectations, jacked up stock prices of
every mortgage lending bank, homebuilder, Realtor/developer, and industry
related company—and with all the associated jobs, wages, and revenue and
development imbedded in that promise, also might have improved the nation’s near/long
term economic prospects.
Strike Six—Why Hold Back Mr. President?
But, no, he passed. Yes, it would
piss off the GOP and send them to the courts and committees screaming for blood?
President Obama, if they don’t have
the 60 votes to stop you, what’s your reluctance?
I mean, which Democrat political constituencies would
not welcome news that carefully regulated conventional home buying
resources—along with your FHA move--would now be unshackled allowing credit
worthy families to purchase a house and possibly accrue their first family generational
wealth?
If done properly any new revenue you
permitted F&F to keep would create a capital buffer protecting taxpayers. There
are no major shareholders who can lay claim to earnings, at least until the
courts decide those matters.
The untaken F&F act would have glossed your legacy and prove that Fannie is good things beyond shaping
national security advisers (!)
But, Mighty Casey Obama swung and
missed. Instead he repeated for GOP consumption some never to be reciprocated political
pabulum about (Maloni paraphrasing) “happy
to work with this new Congress to take down Fannie and Freddie and give the
world to the TBTF banks.”
Looking at the mortgage front
disarray—and knowing that SBC Chairman Dick Shelby (R-Ala.), Speaker John
Boehner (R-Ohio), Senate Majority Leader
Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) don’t want to take on F &F matters this year or
even next, a very smart Washington observer noted, “So the president is
just talking to himself. Crazy that he doesn't do for housing what he is doing
for immigration. Who persuaded him that the GSEs were the root of all
evil?”
Or
as another friend said, ruefully, “Yep, with that comment about working with
the Hill R’s on GSE reform, he told all
the Dem leadership and civil rights groups--which already said no GSE
bill--that he's ready to negotiate with Jeb (Hensarling, R-Tex.) and Chairman
Shelby on handing the mortgage market to the TBTF banks.”
One More Obama Screw Up?
While on the subject, why in the
Hell wasn’t Obama or Mrs. O in Paris, showing support, along with the rest of
the world leaders? Was that a diplomatic
“mooning” or what? I hope AIPAC and its allies noticed because many others did!
Our ambassador to France, Jane Hartley, represented the United
States. That is part of her job, but Ms. Hartley should have had some heavy
hitter backups.
As the WH twiddles its thumbs and Treasury’s Jack Lew sends out op-eds, the TBTF banks hope to gouge away anything remaining of the Dodd-Frank law which once sought to handcuff parts of Wall Street.
After striking late in last years’
end of the session budget bill, relaxing federal regulatory control, the big
guys, procedurally, came up short last week in the House on a package of
pro-bank regulatory relief bills.
They will try, again, in the House this week with easier rules applying and they’ll succeed. (See Morgenson article later.)
The nation’s largest financial institutions
paid this Administration well over $225 Billion in financial regulatory fines. And
this is the group that President Obama thinks will deal a fair hand to American
consumers, whether its home mortgages, personal loans, or car and student loans???
Coming Invasion of Investors Unite
The
Capitol Hill visits from Investors Unite affiliates Tuesday
and Wednesday, engaging their Senators, House members, their staffs,
and media should provide reads whether F&F issues, including the
“takings” court cases, are taking hold with anyone up there.
We’ve
reported on reasons for generic optimism-- President Obama in Phoenix
notwithstanding--and the political and substantive impracticality of GOP
alternatives, but talking with elected officials who sit on the SBC and HBC—or
their assistants—will freshen the intelligence.
As
I counseled a few IU-ers, it’s a marathon not a sprint, so be prepare to
contact and visit the Hill denizens again and again, as these issues will not
easily resolve themselves, as recent history suggests.
Sen. Warren
It’s
worth noting that Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is positioning herself to be
a major player on all these matters, especially where the big bank interests
concentrate.
She
seems to be the only member in either chamber truly exercised about the package
of bank regulatory relief issues which the House will take up and pass this
week. Maybe in the new Senate minority, she can show more clout.
Will This GOP Leopard
Change His Spots?
Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell didn’t breathe life into his promises to engage
in a different tone and set of practices when, officially, he became Majority
Leader last week, as the Washington Post reports. Maybe Mitch just was having a
bad day and plans to unveil a new, happier, less confrontational “Mean Mitch”
on some other day?
In
contrast, Speaker John Boehner towed the more moderate line.
and…
What Others are Saying?
Speaking about Investors Unite,
there will be a GSE hero among them Tuesday and Wednesday, when prolific writer
David Fiderer joins with the group.
DF’s work graced the National
Mortgage News twice in recent weeks, skewering Peter Wallison (really Peter, you told the Congress “that?”
about Ed Pinto’s work) and Ed DeMarco.
IU-ers in town, make sure you
say “Hi” to the “Hebrew Hammer.”
and….
http://www.nationalmortgagenews.com/news/commentary/how-to-read-a-cbo-report-on-housing-finance-1043526-1.html
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Gretchen Morgenson
warns Dodd-Frank fans that the GOP is coming in her Sunday NYT column.
Tim Mayopoulos, Fannie’s CEO, surprised
many—for his determination and aggressive posturing—when, speaking in Atlanta, he
extolled Fannie (and Freddie) and warned against dramatically changing the mortgage
finance system.
(Totally shocked/surprised were the
sleeping “Freddie’s,” who prefer the “hunker down, smile, and don’t piss off anybody”
CEO Don Layton approach.) Quick, someone put a mirror under Don’s nose!
Mortgage Bankers Say…..
The MBA’s David Stevens—who,
depending on the direction of the wind or the day the week, opposes what
Mayopoulis supports then decided that anyone seeking GSE recapitalization—as I and
others do-- was “cartoonish,” as he was quoted by Inside Mortgage Finance;
that is until Stevens walked back his statement the next day.
“Well paid chameleon,” was one
Stevens descriptor I heard after his flip-flop or, just maybe, DS got called by
some of his smaller association members who like working with F&F and want
them around, say, through God’s lifetime.
______________________________________________
NYT’s Maureen Dowd “highlights” (pun?) Speaker Boehner in her weekly column, with
a tongue in cheek but not too inaccurate story.
A Congressional Dilemma!
Fannie and Freddie’s annual revenue
now shuttled to the Treasury’s General Fund, easily, could cover President
Obama’s $60 Billion, 10 year estimated cost of providing free community college
tuition to every American high school grad who wants to go.
GOP Congress: “Let’s see do we kill F&F and give the
entire mortgage market—and all the revenue--to the TBTF banks or do we use
F&F revenues to fund free community college for all eligible high school
graduates?”
GOP Congress: “Nope, banks will do more for us then all of those smarter
better prepared kids.
______________________________________________________
Oil’s economic winners and
loser, as per Al-Jazerra.
______________________________________________
Maloni,
1-12-2015
Thanks for all you do!
ReplyDeleteI wanted to post this for your readers
Thank You
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE info@investorsunite.org
January 14, 2015 866-288-3537
**Congressional Staff Invited to Attend Investors Unite Briefing TODAY at 12 noon.**
50 Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Shareholders to Attend Capitol Hill Briefing in Washington to Advocate for Housing Finance Reform that Includes Shareholder Rights
WASHINGTON, D.C -- Tim Pagliara, Investors Unite Executive Director, will host an event with 50 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders on Capitol Hill TODAY at 12 noon in Russell Senate Office Building, Room SR-485.
Members of Investors Unite will attend the Hill briefing event as part of an Investors Unite Capitol Hill Summit, which includes constituent meetings with Members of Congress to advocate for GSE reform that respects shareholder rights and the rule of law and brings stability to the marketplace.
WHO: Tim Pagliara, Investors Unite Executive Director &
Investors Unite Members/Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Shareholders
WHEN: Today, January 14, 2015
12 noon - 1:30 pm EDT
WHERE: Russell Senate Building Room SR-485;
2 Constitution Avenue Northeast, Washington, D.C. 20002
NOTE: To reserve your place, please RSVP to info@investorsunite.org
WEBCAST: Click here to watch the Investors Unite Capitol Hill briefing.
About Investors Unite: Formed by Tennessee investor and CapWealth Advisors Chairman and CEO, Tim Pagliara, Investors Unite (www.investorsunite.org) is a coalition of over 1,400 private investors from all walks of life, committed to the preservation of shareholder rights for all invested in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The coalition works to educate shareholders and lawmakers on the importance of adopting GSE reform that fully respects the legal rights of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders and offers full restitution on investments.
I hope they show up, Mr. F.
ReplyDeleteHad lunch yesterday with one of the IU attendees and some DC mortgage professionals.
I am looking forward to what the IU-ers hear when they encounter Hill folks today.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteYes, Yes, the original paper circulating swiftly about Treasury and Hank Paulson's actions under HERA and later Third Amendment follies, is an original completed recently by J. Timothy Howard, Fannie's former CFO.
It's is creating quite a stir on other websites and something I just read leads me to believe whomever pulled their comment from my blog was asking that question (at least that individual wrote on another blog he was asking me about JTH authorship).
Yes, Bill, it was me. I came to the conclusion that it was, indeed, Mr. Howard. But, I thought my inquiry with you would be redundant. Thank you, however.
ReplyDeleteBest regards,
Bryndon Fisher
Bryndon, no such thing as a naive or incorrect question, especially when F&F are involved.
ReplyDeleteThey just are questions for which people need answers!
Spread Tim's paper far and wide