I am
glad 2014 is in the rearview mirror!
Let me wish New Year’s health and happiness to all
those who read the blog, I hope your December went well.
Hello 2015, what’s taken you so long to get here? Except
for the stock market growth and other slowly improving economic numbers, your
predecessor—“2014”--produced some sorry, crappy results!
Big
Partisan Storm Coming?
Congress is back in tomorrow (hide the women and children). We are headed for a whirlwind
year—not just on Fannie and Freddie issues—so cinch your seat belt tight and
get ready to rumble with the bad guys, since they will be out there in droves.
Let’s start with some positive news, at least from my
perspective. I think the case for F&F functioning in some traditional
mortgage market capacity will grow, despite the GOP’s new control of Congress.
Other
good things
Despite constant criticism from some quarters, it’s hard to
argue that the economy is not improving and continues to produce jobs and
positive numbers, not to mention lower gas prices. Charlie Krauthammer and
George Will--who promises in his column that Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) is “the Senator to watch in 2015”--may
denigrate those results (and have), but not a ton of others, especially when
they compare it to the mess President Obama inherited.
This positive backdrop will make Congress less edgy. The
congressional GOP claims it wants to show the nation it can lead and make sound
bipartisan policy, but overplaying its hand could produce political and
economic setbacks, so I hope they’ll be cautious.
The partisan reality is R’s seldom will garner the
necessary 60 votes to override President Obama’s formal rejections. If the 47 D
and D-leaning votes today in the 2015 Senate hold, with judicious Obama’s
vetoes, the nation can avoid GOP designed structural chaos or misguided
legislation.
For
several reasons, I believe more people—media, policy makers, and the general
public—have their ears and minds open and are willing to listen to the F&F
case.
Mainly, the Republican F&F mortgage plan options mostly
suck and more people realize it.
It sounds good for the GOP to say, “Let the banks do it,” except when their constituents understand
the banks don’t want to do it, unless given new federal subsidies out the
wazoo. And, importantly, banks don’t like to make and keep fixed rate loans on
their books.
GSE advocates are not all on the same wavelength, yet, nor
are they together on employing the same tactics, but that situation is
improving.
(I’d still want to know who TH717 identifies as his
institutional “allies” and when he will come forth with the promised reports
on some of the original OFHEO spoilers. Anyone who talks to him can ask him
those questions for me.)
I don’t know TH717’s identity,
but wish him well and hope he has real “backers” and is onto something
substantive.
The more citizens and voters who get involved with policy
discussions and communicate with and visit their Senators and Congressmen/women,
the better the result.
Look to next Tuesday, January 13, when some of Investors Unite 1300 members trek to
Capitol Hill to pitch their case; hopefully, we’ll get some fresh feedback.
CBO and Tim Howard
717
Getting a little micro, part of my optimism is the
excellent blog work TH717 performed on
the latest CBO report (see link below).
CBO has had a GSE institutional erection (CBO doesn’t like
them!) for at least 25 years and the current report’s findings are no
different, but something happened on the way to the government printer and TH717 nailed and highlighted it.
Along with the traditional GSE skewering, the primary CBO
author found ways to say systemically good things about F&F and more
importantly highlight the negatives about the various alternatives out there, mostly
championed by R Senators and Members.
That’s crucial because those challenges are not from the “usual” pro-housing/F&F, progressive
suspects offering these views.
Kudos to 717’s blog/work. Read his 12-27-2014 offering, if
you haven’t, and use those CBO comments in your own communications.
Scalise
and all that……
Expect a lot more scummy behavior and exposures of the GOP congressional
ruling class as this year unfolds. Conservative R’s should remember, when you lay with dogs you get up
with fleas.
We’ve had one GOP House resignation, when a Michael Grimm
(R-NY) confessed to tax evasion charges and said he is quitting. Grimm once
threatened to toss an inquiring newsman off the Cannon congressional office
building balcony.
House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), was media-outed for
meeting years ago with White Nazi-leaning extremists.
Scalise’s actions were defended by no less than former
(?) Klan Grand Wizard David Duke, who also expressed surprise that
Scalise didn’t know the Duke acolytes, who Scalise addressed 10 or so years ago,
were a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organization.
Scalise, hiding behind his personal religion’s dogma as proof
he doesn’t identify with the Klan types, didn’t offer the best defense when you
consider that so many recent convicted pederasts and defrocked child molesters shared
that religion’s “shall nots.” Et tu, Steve?
Now David Duke is extorting and threatening other R’s, saying he’ll
name them as his friends and allies if they don’t suck up to and support
Scalise. With friends like David Duke, who needs……..!
Democrats are applauding DD, do your thing, man!! Spew
those names and help the cause.
More
Dogs and fleas
In addition to Obamacare, immigration, more relief for the
big banks, cuts in programs for the poor, and tax relief for corporations—and
more--you know congressional R’s will go after anything remaining of the
Dodd-Frank legislation, including the Consumer Finance Protection Board (CFPB),
the brainchild of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
Here, Sen. Warren, let me hold your coat while you pummel
those guys!
This combat will be fun to watch as—with their Big Banks
allies cheering--the GOP attempts to explain why neutering the CFPB really is helping little folks and consumers.
(Irony:
Had the GOP let Warren’s appointment to run the CFPB go through, they wouldn’t
have had to face her, later, as a more powerful crusading US Senator, opposed
to much the party supports.)
Delightful
Miscreants Royce and Garrett
On the GSE front, the gift that keeps on giving, Ed Royce
(R-Cal.), is going to go after the Mel Watt’s rental housing fund decision,
according to a Royce staffer quoted in Inside Mortgage Finance.
Politicians don’t enjoy looking stupid, even when they cause
of that situation. Royce looked plain clueless last year when he proclaimed
that F&F hadn’t repaid US taxpayers anything, while ignoring the roughly
$230 Billion with F&F’s DNA on it, which they’re shuttled to the Treasury’s
General Fund.
“In for a dime, in for a dollar.” Likely, Ed, will dip into
that stupidity well for more.
All the hits Royce took on his personal/constituent
website, after his inglorious and wrong comments, apparently didn’t made him
any smarter, either.
Garrett
Claims GSE Lobbying
Obviously, Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ)—who wrote a
complaining letter to FHFA Director Mel Watt about the GSEs lobbying--was too
new or likely not important enough to get lobbied much by Fannie Mae, when he
first arrived in Congress in 2003.
Or he would appreciate the stark contrast between how
Fannie (and Freddie) once lobbied as compared to the passive “respond to congressional office inquiries,
only” policy that now control F&F interaction with the Hill.
The fact that James Lockhart, F&F regulator in 2008--exercising
God only knows what self-aggrandized authority-- ordered the two to curtail lobbying
activities and staffs and even drop significant communications with the Hill.
Go crazy with this, you constitutional lawyers.
The
federal government, acting through Lockhart, effectively denied corporate First
Amendment rights to only those two recipients of Treasury financial aid, a
situation which persists today.
No banks, investment banks, insurance companies or others
were banned from Capitol Hill lobbying. (I’m
sure those GOP sainted sources—with their fat campaign PACs--don’t bother Rep.
Garrett with their active and pushy $$$$$ lobbying.)
Congressman Garrett has adopted the subjective
“pornography” approach to defining GSE lobbying, i.e., “I’ll know it when I see
it,” to spur his hollow complaints, because the evidence he cites is pretty
thin.
Maloni
looking back: “Go Medieval”
Ennui doesn’t hit me often, but Garrett’s fantasies--“They’re lobbying me”--make me wish I
once again ran what many people, years ago, believed was the finest lobbying
operation in DC and I could show Rep. Garrett—or any other Senator or
Member--real lobbying and grassroots outreach.
Back then, Garrett might have experienced dozens of his
constituents contacting his office questioning his sensitivity and motives; at
the same time, an overwhelming number of
phone calls might tangle his office telephone lines; he might have to react
when some local media, editorially, questioned Garrett’s paranoia in the face
of no real GSE lobbying evidence; or even have some of his large NJ campaign contributors, not to mention a national trade association or two,
spell out for him the importance of F&F mortgage operations to their local
customers—often Garrett’s own voters--and his contributors’ job and revenue
generating businesses.
That is part of what some others did when Ed Royce popped
off, so errantly; not that I am suggesting
anyone do the same with Rep. Garrett or any other hypersensitive or
hypocritical public official.
More
Needed
A few other pieces of this puzzle need to come to fruition
this year, too.
The Obama Administration has to hold the line in 2015. The public
must wake up to the threats to their largely
effective mortgage finance system as well as understand it is being harried by
the selfish commercial and ideological interests, who—in part—have paid $230 billion in federal financial regulatory
fines in the past few years for gross behavior.
No matter their superior numbers, I don’t think a GOP
majority will rush to disrupt the mortgage finance system just before crucial
Senate and 2016 presidential elections, especially without a reasonable
replacement.
The
Lawsuits
I cop the same uncertain plea as I did at the end of last
year with “Third Amendment” and related cases in the hands of Judges who haven’t
warmed my heart with their initial F&F decisions or public comments. Maybe that
won’t matter when they make some final decisions but part of me (the cynic)
thinks it will.
Judge Lamberth’s misguided call will trouble and annoy me
to the end of my days or until it’s overturned by his more thoughtful peers.
New
GOP Lineup on Senate Banking
Here are the Republican Senators who will sit on the SBC in
this session of Congress.
Richard Shelby, Alabama, Chairman
Mike Crapo, Idaho
Bob Corker, Tennessee
David Vitter, Louisiana
Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania
Mark Kirk, Illinois
Jerry Moran, Kansas
Tim Scott, South Carolina
Tom Cotton, Arkansas
Mike Rounds, South Dakota
Ben Sasse, Nebraska
Dean Heller, Nevada
(New members Cotton,
Rounds, Sasse and Scott, all were elected in 2014; Scott, after appointed to
fill a Senate vacancy in 2013.)
Something New for the Next Few Blogs
For reasons of fresh insight. Speculation, and change--as
well as possible blog material—I want to encourage you to write to me or the
blog (comment section) your 2015 GSE
concerns, predictions, on any aspect or development in the F&F
universe. Use any format, even just ask
some questions.
Let’s see what we harvest from this intelligent and clever
group of blog readers.
What
Others are Saying?
Will President Obama mention F&F—in Phoenix on Thursday--when
he previews his State of the Union in three cities this week and reportedly
will address housing? (I am told “no.”)
____________________________________________________________
Yay,
Michael Krimminger!! (Best piece, yet, written on the GSE
court case principles. Absolutely outstanding and needs broad circulation and
reading. Take a copy to the Hill, IU!)
__________________________________________
McCain
goes after Arizona TP. I don’t often agree with Senator John McCain
(R-Ariz.), but he seems to be doing the right thing here.
___________________________________________________
Gretchen
Morgenson, three weeks ago,
writing in the NYT about the AIG case.
Morgenson wrote:
"Mr. Greenberg, the former chief executive of A.I.G. —
the insurance company whose failure threatened to bring down much of the
global financial system with it — is not the most sympathetic figure. But the
lawsuit he has brought on behalf of Starr International, a large stockholder in
A.I.G., seeking compensation for shareholder losses during those crucial days
of the financial crisis, raises troubling issues."
Maloni’s
thought after reading GM is to suggest hedge fund managers, too, may not be "sympathetic,"
either, but their F&F case is as strong, if not a lot stronger than
Starr's.
Will our courts see that through the government’s
disingenuous GSE smokescreen?
Harold
Ford, Jr, in Roll Call. Former MoC squares it up.
__________________________________________
Maloni,
1-5-2015
FnF going free into 2015 ,IMO, thank for you ingenious comment.
ReplyDeleteUnknown, glad you liked it, but what did I say??
ReplyDeleteThanks as usual, Maloni!
ReplyDeleteIt's my pleasure, Joe. Thank you for reading.
ReplyDeletePlease opine on the import of Mayopoulos' comments to the Atlanta Rotary: http://saportareport.com/blog/2015/01/fannie-maes-rebound-means-taxpayers-have-been-repaid-in-full/#sthash.9aIIlOPd.dpuf
ReplyDeleteThanks, as ever!
QM--Two or three things to note.
ReplyDeleteThe first is Fannie's CEO Tim Mayopoulos stated things that most of us have been saying/discussing for weeks or months.
That he stated them with vigor and with a tone of advocacy is more news than his words alone, although those proud CEO words are welcome.
Yay, TM.
It speaks well of Mayopoulus and whomever at the FHFA blessed his remarks, as is the standard practice.
Maybe, now, we can add regulatory flexibility to our list of GSE positives.
It would be nice to hear something similar from the President when he visits Phoenix this week or even from Director Watt, the next time he speaks.