Some GSE Notes, plus my observations
about our President!
I keep looking for some commonality
among the sparse GSE-related doings, as I try to analyze what's going on in
Washington both to explain them from my historic perspective and even to hazard
a guess to future developments.
But it is tough finding positive Fannie/Freddie
things, let alone loads of cohorts in DC.
Investors Unite does an excellent job, the small lenders (CMLA) and the Independent Bankers are stalwarts, plus the low-income housing community
we have helps, but we have few foot soldiers, let alone corps leaders.
With almost no GSE advocates beyond
those mentioned, ones who read and exalt Tim Howard’s superb blog, and a few
folks who say nice things in response to my posts, Fannie and Freddie allies
are not numerous.
We’re a small group.
Doing my best Johnny Carson, “How
small is it you ask?”
Well, Tim Howard and I planned to host a
joint meeting of all of our GSE fans. We figured two discarded, but contiguous
public telephone booths near Capitol Hill would suffice for the meeting, plus permit
sufficient space for vendors.
We decided one Dunkin'
donut and two cups of coffee should cover all our guests’ food needs, and the
public restroom in nearby Union Station could handle the toilet needs of all of
our participant.
Our group is so small, if he drops
in, we expect Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.)
might be the tallest attendee.
(Lame humor attempt. No, Howard and
I are not doing such an event.)
Seriously, I see little near term
positive for Fannie and Freddie, except the continuing obtuse nature of
our opponents for which we all must be thankful because therein is where we
have hope.
Last week 127 mortgage bankers, from
across the country, wrote to congressional leaders, rhetorically wringing their
hands exhorting lawmakers to write powerful “kill the GSEs legislation” (my
terminology not theirs) before either Federal Housing Finance Agency
Director Mel Watt or Treasury Secretary Steve
Mnuchin acts through executive fiat on their own version of “GSE
reform,” which scares them”
Legislation ain’t happening—with uninformed Senators and Members Congress tripping over
their ancient/dogged biases--nor will GSE fans get much help from the courts,
including the SCOTUS, which all can hide behind the “Lamberth opinion.”
It appears Judge Royce
Lamberth decision's delivered without having all of the relevant facts--denied
him by our very own Justice Department--gave subsequent federal judges all the
cover and justification they needed not dig into the GSE issues and accept the
DoJ falsehoods.
Also, from Mt. Olympus or wherever
the Wall Street Journal‘s editorial board hangs outs—we heard thunder,
lightning, and anguish as the heavens opened up—and the fearsome (and
now maybe fearful?) WSJ opined in its predictable anti-GSE
way—sounding like those MBA members, the trade association, and its President
and CEO David Stevens--worrying that the Trump Administration (really Secretary
Mnuchin) might act unilaterally and support the GSEs.
All that did was make me root for
the WSJ’s and the MBA’s, fears since it would cause the WSJ editorial staff
gastric distress (keeping in mind my late
mother’s curse on all who crossed her or her children, “May they need
kaopectate for the rest of their lives!”).
After reading that MBA letter and
the WSJ’s editorial lament, I screamed, “Yes mortgage bankers. From your fears
to God’s ears, let’s all root for Mnuchin and/or Watt rising to the GSE rescue!”
I think that either of those two
officials--Watt acting on his belief in “access and fairness” and Mnuchin on
his knowledge of how securities markets work (not to mention the
$100 Billion plus he could recoup for the federal government)--would do
a better, more efficient, less disruptive, less biased, open minded, and
constructive job for the nation’s mortgage markets and homebuyers, than
anything this Congress could design on their best day.
I sure hope the MBA and the WSJ are
onto something with their anxieties and horrible dreams of Treasury or FHFA
action, because--as I’ve written before--I think that’s the best near term hope
for Fannie and Freddie, not some GOP blessed Fannie/Freddie literal statutory
execution.
A Bit More Fannie and Freddie
--Adding to possible FHFA mystery
steps--an agency which can’t do much without blessings from Treasury—is the agency mandate to the GSEs to increase their respective Returns on Equity
(ROE). That regulatory ask often—but not always—is a call for more revenue.
That should cleanse anything
lingering in the MBA’s bowels, since—simply—if FHFA wants the GSEs to generate
greater income/revenue by raising their respective prices, it also suggests
someone wants the GSEs to maintain their operations. That prospect flies in the
face of the MBA’s destroy the GSEs position and should make those 127 mortgage
banking letter signers consider kaopectate, too. (See above).
--Does anyone think that well-known
former Obama anti-GSE source, recently seen visiting several Senate offices—who
is not registered as a lobbyist—is working on the very positive “Moellis Plan,” which would free
Fannie and Freddie and let them bloom once again??
I doubt it. Chances are that Jim Parrott’s Senate hob knobbing again
with the Corker-guys with whom he worked on the earlier “give the big banks
what they want, but kill Fannie and Freddie proposal.” If that is what unregistered
lobbyist Parrott is doing, is he going to come clean with the Secretary of the
Senate, report himself to the Ethics Committee, or will any of those GOP
offices and staff blow the whistle on him??? (Don’t hold your breath.)
Mueller, Russia, Putin, and
President Trump?????????
Special Counsel Robert Mueller and
his staff last week filed 13 indictments against Russian individuals and
institutions for interference in the 2016 US presidential election, backing his
charges with very precise, detailed, and copious evidence showing exactly what
the Russian perps did, starting two years earlier in 2014.
Those details describe an astounding
invasion and threat. The President’s indifference confuses and astounds me.
I’m not talking about possible collusion with the President’s campaign--that issues hasn't been addressed by Mueller, yet--but just the Russian boldness and audacity (which
DJT should combat, not accommodate).
The President, who has been
squirming, deriding, and stiff-arming the Mueller work as “fake news
and a hoax,” first reacted to Mueller’s latest indictments with a very
predictable Trump position (paraphrasing), “Yes, but there was nothing saying
my campaign colluded with the Russians,” as if as elected leader of the United Sattes he had
no stake in honest American elections not poisoned by foreign meddling.
Really, really??
Mr. President where was/is your concern
that an overseas adversary government--historically and unchangingly
antithetical to US interests and institutions--sought successfully to
infiltrate our electoral process, undermine its validity, and insure Russian political
and societal objectives, including elect you President??
Where is your personal and national
anger, your patriotic outrage and fury, Mr. President??
Except for some angry tweets
accusing everyone but the guy looking back from his mirror (which is Trump S.O.P.),
the President of the United States said very little, beyond trying to blame it all
on Barack Obama.
Mr. Trump, do you think your bro Putin
had anything to do with this matter or any of our international headaches?
This week, lamely and late, the
President finally asked AG Jeff Sessions to look into future implications of this
type of invasive election skullduggery.
Prior to that Sessions
request—despite the world knowing Russia was guilty of a variety of mischief
and dishonesty--Trump did nothing pre-emptive, asked nobody at the FBI or any of our
national security agencies to protect the integrity of this nation’s future
elections, with an important one coming up in 10 months. In fact, he claimed he
believed Putin when the Russian thug said his country and its spy services did
none of these things.
How do we know DJT did "nada" to head
off future election tampering? The heads of each of our national security
agencies, publicly, testified to that sorry fact just days ago in the Senate.
Why does Trump “turtle” for Russia
and its political hooliganism?
In addition to the Trump family’s
wet dream of doing massive hotel building and development in the former Soviet
Union (whose leaders still act just as their Tsarist and Communist predecessors
did), it’s likely the Russians must have something on DJT which explains his
dramatic reticence.
Trump the businessman--who still
refuses to share with the nation all of his tax returns and their details--may
have started borrowing money from Russian banks and oligarchs, when his
financial fortunes ebbed in the past. He may even have engaged in the massive
money laundering those Russian sources, banks, and officials required and still
need as they sought to launder and hide literally billions of dollars. (Big US
real estate purchases via Trump Inc. could hide that, too.)
Remember Eric Trump telling Fox
News, “My dad’s favorite color is green.” (Yes “green,” more than red, white,
and blue.”)
What else—besides the reported
“Steele dossier pictures”—can cause our
current President to be the only US President since the end of World War II to
so compliant/soft on Russia and its leaders?
He still won’t mention Putin/Russia
etc. or their election interference. Before the Mueller 13 indictments, he
refused to extend stronger sanctions on these same Russian officials after the
Senate and House—with record bipartisan votes—directed him to do so. But, now
he has evidence, confirmed by his
Justice Department appointments.
As you think about the Mueller 13
indictments look back at all of the Trump statements and accusation trying to
steer the nation away from that finding and the extending possibilities.
Trump: “It’s not
me. It’s the guy behind the tree” (with all due respect to former
Senator Russell Long (D-La.).
Washington Post editorial on preventing Russian or other
foreign election interference.
Marjory Stoneman Douglas High
School, Parkland Florida
There is very little I can or will
add to lament the horrible massacre of those 17 students and teachers and the
wounding of others.
As with most of these ordeals, it
brought out the best and worst of us.
After offering his "thoughts and prayers," I am glad someone suggested the
President meet with the kids and their parents, as well as those from other school
murder tragedies, even if DJT had to rely on WH-provided notes to
help him remember to convey compassion.
But the time for words will shortly
pass and the craven NRA-butt kisser ("the NRA leaders all are patriots,"
DJT said this week) will be confronted with congressional demands for
action to make these war weapons more difficult to acquire for anybody, but
certainly youthful buyers.
Well see if our President walks the
walk then, or lets the NRA and its allies back him down?
In the meantime, Trump can show
leadership and maturity in telling the world (and his Trump tweet mob)
that the Parkland kids are not paid actors or traveling agitators for
hire, currently a favorite GOP meme.
The President should mirror the
grace of Senator John McCain, who--when running against Barack Obama in
2008--was asked by a follower "if Obama was an Arab?”
A resolute McCain, on national TV,
said, "No,
ma'am. He's a decent family man [and] citizen that I just happen to have
disagreements with on fundamental issues and that's what this campaign's all
about. He's not [an Arab]."
That’s the character
a leader shows.
Maloni, 2-25-2018