We/You
Can Do It!
(I
know I promised to stay silent and on vacation for a bit, but I got moved by
some of the events mentioned below and felt that I should get this out of my
system.)
Let’s do this for the Red, White and Blue, George
Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Crispus Attucks, the Civil War, Jim Bowie, Abe
Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, the Belleau Wood, FDR, Normandy, Iwo Jima, John
Wayne, Ike, Korea, JFK, Viet Nam, LBJ, MLK, Reagan, Desert Storm, 9-11, the
Boston bombings….
The recent death of former US Senator Howard Baker, a GOP
legislative giant who was known for his ability to do what few public officials today can do, i.e. bring together his D&R colleagues--with
disparate political positions-- and forge common support of sound public policy,
is a reminder of the paucity of current Senators.
Our current patriotic fervor
over the US soccer team, all of the very-American traditional Fourth of July
events with , water activities, picnics, parades, backyard barbecues, fireworks,
plus the nation’s deep unhappiness with both houses of Congress, bred my latest
and next good idea (NGI).
This one could be gargantuan, even geometrically
so, if the nation buys it.
Upon considering this NGI, the people who like it might
throw up their hands and wail, “It can never happen.”
My response, “Nonsense.” Don’t underestimate the will
and power of the American people if properly educated and directed. Put your
shoulder and voice behind it.
OK, here’s the predicate.
Ever so slowly, current Senators and Members are retiring
or occasionally being defeated by challengers, but it’s not happening fast
enough to rid the system all of the obstructionists.
Those departures, certainly, are not occurring speedily to the
collection of D&R do-nothings, now residing in Congress, who claim
otherwise but prefer bickering to comity and finger pointing to bipartisan
cooperation. Not all of that is about the Tea Party.
At one time or another, virtually every Senator and Member
has expressed frustration and disgust at events in Washington—usually blaming
the other party—and they’re right (think much
deserved circular firing squad) and ruminated about departing.
So, let’s give them that chance, with some honor, by facilitating
a democratic (small “d”) purge opportunity.
But, how to dust them?
Since no elected official will deny loving the USA and
our democratic principles, I suggest—in the interest of the nation (and some,
many, or all of the issues initially mentioned)--citizens rally to support
the proposition that ALL SITTING SENATORS
AND CONGRESSMEN AND CONGRESSWOMEN SHOULD RESIGN THEIR POSTS BEFORE THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL
ELECTION in time to permit their constituents to run for their vacant seats
and replace them, representing that state or little delineated piece of
geography.
Any Senator or Member can out this into a formal resolution and
introduce it the next time they’re back in town; then let congressional/media nature
take its course.
No sitting official will fail to claim he/she is a “patriot,” so citizens need to appeal to
the MoC’s patriotic pride and you—their voters—need to convince them that they are
“messing up” and should move on to facilitate democracy and a clean sweep of all
procrastinating bloviating congressional idlers.
Most people hate the job Congress is doing, but say they
like their US Representative; but that doesn’t add up. Chances are good that your
Senator/Representative is just as bad as the rest of them or why else is the
place so constipated with regard to producing meaningful legislation?
The American people deserve this mass exodus and, trust
me, nobody should be afraid of losing talent or skills with a forced
outmigration of their current Congressman or Senator, especially as most are not
crucial to the legislative and governing process, as frequently they’ve
displayed.
Yes, we could try and vote against them in November but
that would permit too many to return.
What a better way to show their love of country,
democracy, and nationalism than if all incumbents step aside for an equal from back home,
someone who—in the eyes of the Constitution--certainly can do the same job?
We’ll get some of the same types back, maybe in about the
same proportions, but a clean flush of all of those failed congressional types
might provide some opportunity for the next President—no matter who he or she
is or what his or her party—to concentrate on proposing decent policy which
might get a seal of approval from a “new Congress,” literally, before it gets
tainted. (Think Howard Baker progress!)
I feel very confident predicting that opposition to the NGI--
from any congressional incumbent--will be transparent and all about them losing
their perks and “status,” not about what the people they represent need.
“Harumph, haff kaff, and jeepers! But, I can do so much
for the people of…….!”
Can it, sir/madam, just go and enjoy your pension.
There are hundreds (maybe thousands) of well qualified
people who can serve as the Senator from any state or Representative from any
congressional district.
Don’t be fooled or bullied even by your own “ham and
egger.” Let them retire under your support for this idea and carry their “doesn’t
play well with others” attitudes with them and give someone else a chance who
hopefully will do better.
The voters hardly can do worse.
Yes, we might lose some experience and talent, but none that is irreplaceable. The new
men and women coming to Congress will learn quickly on the job, as will the new
subcommittee and full committee chairs.
Every public official fantasizes he or
she is essential to the congressional process, performing as a stalwart “blacksmith at
the forge of democracy,” just as the Constitutional fathers intended.
The
reality is quite the opposite.
There probably are a handful of US Senators and Members who
do the representational/legislative job, well; but the dirty little secret (among many other Washington
and political DLSs) is that even they know there are a legion of people back
home, just as capable of representing that piece of congressional real estate.*
(*This thought about ample replacements has been with me
for a long time, especially when Congress began taking elaborate steps to
protect their asses from every known threat man could conceive of and then
some. That started, long before 9-11, when some jackass put a cluster of cherry
bombs in a Capitol public lavatory. Their elaborate Hill security shutters them from
the people. The blocked off roads through the Capitol. All of these self-anointed Princes and
Princesses could be wiped out and just as quickly replaced by constituents who
could step up and represent their neighbors quite well. The Hill is rife with
self-invented “institutional arrogance” and there is more of it than most
citizens realize.)
Now, if I could just get the SCOTUS interested in
voluntary retirements?
Maloni,
7-3-2014
(Happy note: almost immediately upon getting onto Skyline Drive as they drove toward Big Meadow campground, four Maloni munchkins saw a large bear.
A cranky Park Ranger—used to bear sightings--chided a
certain motorist for driving too casually, so his passengers could watch the bear.)
4 comments:
Love the idea and would whole heartily support. Fear too many of the "old guard" enjoy and crave the power. If they have been on the hill for 15+ years they get used to the perks and entitlement.
I could see them publicly supporting such a proposal and then look to make exceptions for each other under the guise of
"necessary transition" etc.
Other problem is the American people. Too many sit out the political process (especially the primaries) and allow the remaining few to nominate or re-elect the same people the majority despise. A weakness of the two party system is the inability to easily provide other choices.
Thanks Anon--Start the ball rolling in your part of the nation.
It's my pipe dream but there is enough unhappiness that some grassroots demand could generate momentum for change or might trigger other suggestions which could achieve the same result.
You know well--and expressed it--that the old dogs would bitch and moan and sink and such movement.
I know I've never seen it this bad in my more than 40 years watching both chambers of Congress and the WH interact.
Ironically, it could be new MoC's who see the deadlocks and understand the rigidity built into the system to protect any incumbent (both parties) as what needs to change.
Bad idea, Bill!
Like term limits or a new Constitutional Convention--we'd likely get worse than we've got! Yes, scary, but all too possible! Trading the devil that we know . . . .
I suggest that we go back to more balanced Congressional districts, and forget about trying to elect specific ethnic monorities. While well-intentioned, that policy created extreme left- and right-wing districts. I hope we'd get better diversity, but I don't believe that only a white person can represent white people and vice versa.
If we have any kind of term limits, would that we could limit lobbyists to 4-year terms!
While you're at it, can you get Justice Ginsburg to retire before it's too late!
Well, what we have is pretty bad and it's beyond D's and R's, it's become institutional which is why I would be willing to risk some talent leaving if all of them bailed.
Why would the GOP, which has the whip hand on drawing congressional districts through their control of the State houses, want to give that up?
Also, term limits have value but I suspect the same people who argue that corporations are people will suggest a voluntary decision to serve only a fixed number of years is OK, but a statutory one is a violation of somebody's First Amendment rights.
A Black man or woman represent a majority White congressional district. I am sorry to say that BHO's performance has hurt those chances in any major way.
I know I am sounding bleak and negative but I feel like John Irving in "The World According to Garp" and--on behalf of the nation--I am feeling a "sense of the undertoad!" (If you didn't read the book and understand the context, "Google it."
Post a Comment