“The
Hammer” Strikes Again and Soon Again!!!
Big
news: His E-Book Coming
I am very pleased and thankful that David Fiderer, who I
dubbed the “Hebrew Hammer”-- for his super researched and tough GSE prose--is
letting me publish the précis of his long awaited e-book,
which everyone following this financial and political drama will want to read
and re-read. (His e-book, shortly will follow, possibly in just days.)
David and I have become friends and political intrigue
buddies and, likely, I have sent him more emails in the past two years than I
have my entire family in all of their lives. I appreciate that he’s shared with
me his many F&F revelations.
Federer’s GSE work—rightly so-- nails a lot of
responsibility and blame on former Bush Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson for his tortured HERA charades, but then shows how
Paulson’s successor, Obama Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, rode with the same dubious script to the highly
undesirable and legally questionable “Third amendment sweep.”
Fiderer’s e-book supports his allegations with publicly
available documents.
Without further ado.
From the desk of David Fiderer.
The conspiracy to
destroy Fannie Mae is not a
conspiracy theory, which
would be based on a series of suspicious-looking dots that appear to
connect. The damning evidence is much
more precise and concrete, and quite apparent when you follow the flow of
funds, the debits and credits, and the repayment of principal and interest.
It is impossible to
compare the public statements with Federal statutes and regulations and numbers
and avoid the inference that a lot of high ranking officials at Treasury, the
SEC and FHFA (and its progenitor, OFHEO) lied to Congress and to the
public. (The most
damning public documents
in relate to the disinformation campaign brought
against Fannie Mae
beginning in 2002. So, while the legitimacy of Freddie Mac was also targeted by
government officials, the focus here is on the
well-documented
conspiracy against Fannie.)
The mendacious Third
Amendment
scheme did not emerge
out of a vacuum. Indeed, the saga may be divided into three interrelated
conspiracies, akin to three acts in a Shakespearean drama. They are:
Act I: The conspiracy to
fabricate the Fannie Mae "accounting scandal,"
Act II: The conspiracy to fabricate a fraudulent
justification for placing the GSEs in conservatorship, and
Act III: The conspiracy
to prevent the
GSEs from ever emerging
out of conservatorship.
The fraudulent
meme--that the
GSEs were on the verge
of collapse in September 2008, so that conservatorship was imperative--was
devised by the same people who devised the fraudulent meme known as the Fannie
Mae accounting scandal, using the same modus operandi, which perverted the
meaning of "safety and soundness."
The fraudulent meme—that
the government had a mandate to severely downsize the GSE business footprint as
an interim step to final abolition--is embedded in Treasury's official policy,
which forbids any discussion of the possibility that the GSEs might
recapitalize.
This policy, which
remains in force, was first set by Timothy Geithner in a report sent to
Congress on February 11, 20011.
The report,
"Reforming America's Housing Finance Market," offered three different
legislative proposals:
1. Abolish time GSEs, so
that the vast majority of
mortgages would be
financed through private sources; or
2. Abolish the GSEs, so
that the vast majority of mortgages would be financed through private sources,
except during a severe downturn, when the government would intervene to
stabilize the market; or
3. Abolish the GSEs and
replace them with a
government-run mortgage
insurance company, which relied on private insurers
taking the first loss.
Only Congress had the
power to revoke the GSE
charters, which were set
by Federal statute. And since GSE abolition is the starting point for any type
housing finance reform, legislative action was imperative.
Shawn Tully described
Geithner's policy in Fortune:
"Geithner's
position enjoyed remarkably wide support from lawmakers, regulators, and
economists across the political spectrum. The prevailing --virtually universal
-- view was, and still is, that the twin colossi of housing finance that stuck
taxpayers with a $189 billion bailout bill after their collapse in 2008, that
inflated the real estate bubble with artificially cheap credit and hence helped
sink the U.S. economy, should never, ever be allowed to regain their former
dominance."
Tully reminds us of H.L.
Mencken's immortal
words, "The
intelligent, like the unintelligent, are responsive to propaganda."
Nothing about that
paragraph survives scrutiny
• Not the $187 billion
bailout bill,
• Nor their 2008
collapse,
• Not their contribution
to the real estate
bubble,
• Not their artificially
cheap credit,
• Not their role in
sinking the Economy.
None of it can withstand
a modicum of fact checking.
Tully accurately
described the scope and magnitude of The Big Lie Industrial Complex, which is
largely financed by Koch Brothers think tanks such as the American Enterprise
Institute and the Mercatus Center, and which extends or beyond the Treasury
Department to America's elite business schools, the Republican Party, and a
multitude of media outlets intent of distracting the public from the magnitude
of Wall Street fraud.
What Others are Saying
While several items
have appeared while I was out of the
office, the one I think most intriguing was this from Trey Garrison’s Housing Wire,
in which former Delaware Attorney General, Myron Steele, argues in an amicus
filing that Delaware State law—under which F&F operated—invalidates the
“Third Amendment sweep.”
Maloni, 7-13-2015
4 comments:
Bill, I hope you had a great time with the family, it's what's most important, for sure!
Thanks for the latest on the Hammer, will be looking for his e-book.
I was wondering if you heard the recent rumblings of the CSP doing some test runs in the next 3-4 weeks? I can't quite place where I saw it, but thought if anyone had some good insight it would be you. Many seem concerned that the Gov't is stalling it's litigation while some GSE foes in congress are pushing for faster completion of the CSP so it can be handed over to the TBTF banks before it can be stopped otherwise. Any insight on where the CSS "really" is with regard to the CSP would be greatly appreciated. Also your insight on the eight groups the FHFA appointed to the CSP outside advisory board, if you care to? I read that most will have one member, but some will have more than one? A way to stack the deck, if you will?
As always, thanks for all you do!
GB--all of this is news to me since I really was isolated with minimal means of keeping up.
Loved thew sun and the food, hated the sand. My grandkids--individually are wonderful, interacting are a Mongol hoard or Berserkers--drove me a little crazy.
On CSP. The big guys want to control the creation and use of the CSP--and nothing will change that. They'll manipulate and complain, which is how they do their thing. Various groups will ally for and against them--and F&F..
Let me see what I can find out and, if it is dramatically different from what we know, I report back.
Thanks for the snippet of David's piece. I would love to read more, if you and/or he would be so kind! And a link to purchase the full paper would be great as well. Thanks!
There will be more, Adam, but David's now in control of that.
As always, I will try and make sure that whatever he produces going forward is made available to the maximum number of interested readers.
Post a Comment