Howard, Rightfully, PO’d; Exposes
Phony FHFA Tests
Fannie and Freddie Pass their Stress
Test, FHFA Fails
Many domestic and a few overseas publications recently
carried a story about the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac (Government Sponsored Enterprises
or GSEs) stress test conducted by
their regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), an examination
called for the GSEs and all major banks in the Dodd-Frank statute.
The Federal Reserve Board carried out those test for the
banks, while the GSE regulator produced Fannie’s and Freddie’s.
Most publications carried the main theme of the FHFA
studies, i.e. in an extreme financial debacle, the GSEs could need over $120
Billion cash infusion from the US Treasury.
But, I wonder if besides peddling the FHFA oppress theme any
of the writers or the venues looked deeply at the tests and understood their
components?
But, that finding is bogus,
as is the structure of the FHFA study, an agency which—historically—has a
somewhat antagonistic relationship with the GSEs and, institutionally, has
little reason to show the two are strong and may not ever require help from the
US Treasury or the FHFA.
(Note: Currently, there are some 30 law suits pending
against the Treasury and the FHFA for various actions applied to the GSEs,
since Fannie and Freddie were place into “conservatorship” in 2008 under then
GOP Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson.)
Here is a counter to the FHFA work. Some enterprising
journalist(s) should ask FHFA specific questions and push them if the agency
suggests its actions were legitimate and accurate.
Tim Howard* knows stress test structures/operations and,
importantly, shows where and how this latest FHFA examination was “gamed”—with
more than $100 Billion in very questionable assumptions-- producing its distorted
loss finding.
If you haven’t already, enjoy reading his August 19, 2016
blog.
In a few
exchanges with me since Tim posted the blog above, he’s mentioned he thinks
FHFA took every subjective number offered by the ST exercise and inflated and
distorted it to produce a horrible outcome. Again, a determined questioner
should ask FHFA why that was so.
I expect
Howard will write more about FHFA’s misleading actions.
Publications and writers covering the
original FHFA stress test story.
In addition
to Bloomberg’s Joe Light and the Wall Street Journal’s John Carney, here are
the names of individual writers or the publications which covered this story.
(Some just had Twitter addresses. If you know any of them or can reach them, do
so. They might want to read Tim’s views and engage FHFA or in a discussion.)
Name
Publication
Title
Contact
Andrea Riquier
MarketWatch housing reporter
@ARiquier
Erika Morphy
Freelance
Journalist
@EMorphy
Ben Lane
Housing Wire
Senior Financial Reporter
@BenLaneHW
Thornton McEnery
Dealbreaker
Editor
@ThorntonMcEnery
Wesley Coopersmith
Heritage Action Grassroots Educational Coordinator @WesleyCoop
Ryan Rainey
Morning Consult Reporter
@ryan_rainey
Others, identified by Google, who/which
covered the story.
Scott Morgan DSNews
FinReg Alert
Tennessee Real Estate
Rama
Cornerstone Credit Union
League
Historical note: *Tim Howard
was Fannie Mae’s former CFO and--along with its Chairman Frank Raines and
Treasurer LeAnne Spencer Garmon—was forced out of Fannie in 2004, by a specious
regulatory charge of “securities fraud,” which later was thrown out court by a
federal judge.
While at Fannie for
more than 20 years, Howard initially designed Fannie Mae’s original stress test
and risk-based capital system. Later, working with Paul Volcker--after the
latter left the Federal Reserve Board in 1991—they refined that model and Congress
adopted Howard’s plan in the 1992 statute which gave Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
those capital paradigms, a new regulator, and national housing goals.
Maloni, 8-22-2016
4 comments:
Here's Carney's response. Typical.
https://twitter.com/carney/status/767759115586310144
Bill...
I could come up with a stress tests that shows Disney insolvent and Apple needing billions of funding.
But what does it matter its all fun and games for the treasury and fhfa... they are less than honest. Wonder what their husbands think of them.
CJ--Carney suggesting Tim Howard doesn't understand and got it wrong. Hilarious.
***************************************
Anon--
IMO, FHFA had the option to play it straight and conduct the stress test much as the Fed did; but the agency chose not to and introduced enough subjective elements to insure the results would look scary, threatening, and raise the spectre of the GSEs needing major taxpayer assistance (which many of us think they didn't in 2008). Surprise, surprise, that result also suggests a bureaucrat's fantasy affirmation of the need for the agency's service.
Just think, if eight years ago, Treasury and the Fed said "the GSEs are fine and still have good businesses, but need some regulatory tightening"--which in effect was what happened but after fevered congressional action, based on shaky factual suppositions, and then federal F&F handcuffs.
Paulson saw the opportunity to carry out the GOP wet dream and throw the GSEs into "conservatorship," with a goal of destroying them and substituting something more to the big bank tastes.
But the markets and the banks didn't play along, since both still support heavily using the GSEs.
I think it is crucial for the nation to understand why a federal regulatory agency charged with sustaining two crucial institutions harbors such punitive feelings about F&F and acts accordingly.
yeezy boost 350
yeezy
kd 11
supreme hoodie
golden goose
off-white
kyrie irving shoes
air jordans
jordan 11
yeezy 700
Post a Comment