First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
because I was not a Socialist.
because I was not a Trade Unionist.
because I was not a Jew.
because I was not a Socialist.
because I was not a Trade Unionist.
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a prominent Protestant
pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the
last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps.
******************************************************
Benjamin
Franklin: “We must, indeed, all hang together or, most
assuredly, we shall all hang separately.”
DJT’s Defeat, Good for
the Nation?
That thudding
“in-your-face-Donald” Trumpcare defeat at the hands of the House Republican
party—abandoning him in his virgin major legislative effort--might have been
the best thing to happen to Donald Trump and the nation since he was
inaugurated.
Of course, he will
pretend he’s above rebuke and spend the next several weeks blaming everyone but
himself. He’ll bear grudges against Paul Ryan, GOP moderates, the Freedom
Caucus, Democrats, his aides, his son in law, the media, maybe Reince Priebus
and "Goebbels" Bannon, anyone not named President Donald J. Trump.
He’ll ignore that Barack
Obama passed the original bill with just Democrat votes, meaning Obama did a
better job when his party was in the majority than Trump did last week, with
the GOP controlling the House (and Senate).
Here’s hoping it makes
him wiser and less vengeful. It could make him realize that Washington
political deal-making is not like buying land or developing golf courses, and
it could make him respect some of what came before his election, relative to
the needs of all of the American people whom he claims to represent.
But, make no mistake,
politically, President Trump took one in the chops last Friday when House
Republicans refused to vote for “his” Obamacare replacement bill and the
proposal was pulled from the floor.
Don’t be derailed by the
WH’s post defeat spin. It was DJT’s bill, even though he implied it belonged to
its House architect Speaker Paul Ryan.
Once President Trump and
his WH staff (VP Spence, CoS Reince Priebus, Counselor Steve Goebbels Bannon,
HHS Secretary Tom Price, and OMB Director Mick Mulvaney), and others, took over
negotiating with House R conservatives and moderates, it was his package--with
Trump’s political DNA all over it—that bought the farm for lack of GOP support.
Post-facto, we hear GOP
grumblings, already, that Trump didn’t understand the legislation or know the
workings of the US healthcare system, but his effort didn’t sink because he
wasn’t a healthcare expert. It was—as usual in DC—because of the politics
(Worth noting how
Democrats and Obama handled their healthcare bill, the work and the challenges.)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/health-care-republicans-repeal-obamacare_us_58d81295e4b03787d3598bf6?0r&
The President can
explain it anyway he wants but the political reality was neither he, Speaker
Ryan, nor the rest of Trump’s troops, could cajole enough of the House GOP to
back the entire bill.
Having seen this kind of
internecine political standoff before, personally, I credit Trump for
wading, albeit inartfully, into the morass and using personal influence to try and secure his objectives (although
I didn’t care for his final legislative package). I hope this result doesn’t
scare him off.
The last days of
wheeling and dealing on legislation-- promising all sorts of related and
unrelated individual Member priorities, is very common and hardly unique to the
GOP. But, the President, his WH staff and cabinet, and the House R leadership,
couldn’t do it successfully—although I expect/hope he will get another
opportunity, if his setback educates and doesn’t leave him risk adverse.
This episode, certainly,
will weigh against his other legislative priorities, tax reform, immigration,
infrastructure spending, and more, but the nation needs him to show sharp emotional and
intellectually recuperation, plus some humility.
Likely, the President
will retreat to Mar-a-Lago for some more taxpayer supported rounds of golf,
sulk, nurse his wounds, try and shed the setback like last year’s snakeskin,
Tweet some untruths, and vow revenge, etc. etc.
But, if the President is
as smart as he claims--and has any sense of how his new office truly works, as
well as his capacity to “lead, not follow”--he might look at the political and
systemic benefits of Obamacare, which exist despite Steve “Goebbels” Bannon’s
protestations, and cobble improvements to that existing law. Build D&R allies
and come back with a stronger healthcare proposal that will get a majority of
votes in both chambers.
It’s not like the
current Obamacare is without flaws. The Congressional Budget Office says
it works, but it could work even better. If DJT would take the socks from his ears
and engage some serious national health experts, not just right wing
ideologues, he could turn this defeat into an eventual win.
In the Senate his climb
is steep because the Democrats have some additional clout. That won’t make his
chore any easier, but it certainly is doable, if he tries for bipartisan
backing.
Despite the WH threats
and claims, Trumpcare isn’t dead although the package which almost made it to
the House will get sheared if/when they start considering it in the Senate. The
chamber works differently.
With 48 Democrats and
enough Senate R’s caught between their own GOP moderates and hardliners, a
thoughtful alternative could incubate.
Donald Trump defied most
every element of the Washington Politics 101 book, so if the
President considers a softer, bipartisan approach it might not be beyond him to
effectively work across the aisle and produce viable healthcare legislation
My Only Russian Comment
this week…
…is an old one. It’s
clear that the House R Keystone Cops can’t put together any kind of independent
investigation of Russian tampering in the US presidential election, without
running to the President with every jot and tittle. An Independent
Counsel/Special Prosecutor must be appointed to answer these questions, assure
our nation that the Russians did not interfere in our last presidential
election, and if they did, they were not invited in to do so by the Trump
campaign or its allies.
Anything short of that
congressional response will be the equivalent of the Warren Commission report
on the John F. Kennedy assassination, meaning a document forever disputed.
Putin and Russia cannot
be trusted. Russians have been our nation’s jealous enemies/rivals since before the end
of WWll and won’t change under their current leaders.
For decades, their
culture and society have been ones of shortages: never having enough freedom, food,
consumer goods, and democracy. To make up for it, they lie, steal, bully, and resort
to thuggery, at home, abroad, wherever they post their flag.
The FBI sees it as do others in our intelligence community, but not some
of the Capitol Hill thickheads charged with looking for it.
______________________________________________
GSE Fix; Hope for DJT
& the Nation?
“Watch
but Don’t Bet”
A few things are moving
in GSE-world this week (and at the end of last).
As the
month of March winds down this week and Fannie and Freddie get ready to shop
$10 Billion to the Treasury’s General Fund, we could see the Treasury
tell Mr. Watt’s FHFA to order the GSEs to keep the money and build their
capital with it!! (Although the Joe Btfsplk in me says
it won’t happen.)
Again,
as written about before, the Trump Administration will need money to pay for
Obamacare or Trumpcare, just like the previous folks did and there is precedent
for using the GSE revenue.
But,
here’s hoping Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and his team prove me wrong and
have bigger and better ideas than the Obama Admin’s.
IMO,
Obama and team certainly embraced the worst idea, i.e. doing away with Fannie and
Freddie and giving the nation’s largest banks new ways to plunder our national
mortgage markets and financially mug would be mortgagors.
****************************************************************
Friday “Surprise,”
Patrick Collins Case,
Hope or More Legal BS
for GSE Advocates?
Is the “Patrick Collins
GSE case,” challenging the Treasury’s 2012 earnings sweep, just a tiny, hopeful
GSE light at the end of the tunnel or is it another roaring diesel ready to
barrel over and through Fannie and Freddie, their allies, investors, and
friends?
I have no idea.
But, let’s recount what happened for
those who missed late Friday’s development.
Last Friday night, the
Treasury Department informed Southern District of Texas federal Judge
Nancy Atlas—hearing the Collins GSE case-- that Treasury no longer supports as
constitutionally viable the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA),
the GSE regulatory agency created by HERA in 2008.
It’s the same position
the Trump Treasury/DoJ recently took in a plaintiffs’ challenge to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
The issue here is the
CFPB (of which I am a great fan) and the FHFA (of which I am not) both are
structured with a single director at the top, as opposed to the more
common regulatory format a group or board of commissioners, etc.
Seeking maximum latitude
to shuffle off regulatory execs it doesn’t support, i.e. Charles Cordray at
CFPB, the Trump Admin now considers both agencies—structurally—to be
unconstitutional, because their Director(s) only can be removed for “cause” and
not at the “will” of the President.
The Trump position—potentially
not actually, yet—calls into legal question a lot of what those
agencies have done in the past.
It’s at
this juncture I’ll stop speculating over what Treasury’s new consistency
means for edicts from the two regulatory agencies, since the result could
be vast or marginal. I’ll let the lawyers among you do that.
Again—since
it just happened and was overshadowed by the House Trumpcare vote--we’ll read
more about this late Treasury submission in the coming weeks, although GSE
Links has some current story ties.
However,
this non-lawyer hopes some court exposes the fact that FHFA, in conjunction
with the Obama Treasury, violated common sense, common law, and—possibly—the
Constitution with its 2012 “profit sweep” actions and, possibly, other GSE
promulgations.
(Before
anyone gets too worked up and starts buying more GSE shares because of a
flip/flop, I must note that some of my more knowledgeable GSE buddies don’t
see any help for the cause in the Treasury Friday communication.)
*************************************************************
Post-Trumpcare
GSE Advice to “Nooch” and DJT—Grab Some Low Hanging Fruit Without Congress
The
Admin already has laid out its coming legislative plans, tax reform,
immigration, infrastructure, etc.
Secretary
Mnuchin should tussle diligently, behind the scenes, to convince the President
that DJT can have a relatively easy win—with respect to the fights imbedded in
his other agenda items—if he OKs existing Mnuchin regulatory authority to
release and recap the GSEs, explaining to the nation why that is a fabulous
contribution to the home owning aspirations of millions of low, moderate and
middle income families, who can manage the financial requirements.
And, it
doesn’t need any formal approval from Congress!
Don’t
pout Mr. President, get right back on that horse and ride with a GSE
resurrection which, properly explained, will have broad appeal to those people
who voted for you and also be part of the job stimulus effort you consider
desirable and inherent in other initiatives.
I am
certain you and your team can pitch reviving Fannie and Freddie to the nation
as a signature Trump achievement and make it stick, since Secy. Mnuchin already
has nailed the substance.
Let me
repeat the best reason to do it.
It
doesn’t need any formal approval from Congress!
Don’t
get PO’d Mr. President, Get GSE’d
Maloni,
3-27-2017
6 comments:
Bill, let's hope Trump, or some within his Admin, reads your blog and does what you prescribe regarding the GSEs. It will be interesting to see if Mnuchin and Watt stop the GSE dividend payment before the 31st, so FnF can do the smart thing and start to build some much needed capital.
What are the odds of that happening? Better than getting dealt a five-card straight flush? I wonder...
Keep up the outstanding work!
I sent a letter Saturday to Mnuchin stating this could be a low hanging fruit. Less than 200 people in the whole country hate GSEs. Should he care?
DJT CAN LABEL THIS PLAN AS TREMENDOUS - There is a HUGE public political win available for whomever can message the return of the GSE'S to full health. With the current budget projections made by the White House, the Government could choose to obtain $150 Billion (approx.) from the right to exercise and purchase 80% of FNMA / FREDDIE through warrants received in 2008 and then sell their interest versus waiting ten years and continuing to fight numerous lawsuits.
This is $150B back to US for infrastructure spending under new president.
It is easy to give something that is not yours. How many years do you think they will have to defend themselves against the lawsuits challenging the exercise of the warrants. The government has been paid 260 billion and (hopefully not) counting. It is enough. Actually it is more than enough.
Anon--
Mnuchin should care and I agree with you, relative to the rest of his issue chores, this would be easy-peasy, with pluses galore about which his boss can brag, especially to the little people.
****************************************************************************
Michael--
See my answer above and you hit on another major one, based on timing and likely value of the Treasury GSE investment.
It's not without opponents but it sure has a smoother pass and HUGELY favorable economic and employment results it properly structured.
yeezy shoes
yeezy 500 blush
supreme outlet
kobe shoes
goyard bags
off white jordan 1
hermes handbags
hermes birkin bag
supreme shirt
supreme sweatshirt
Post a Comment