GSEs and Lots of Trump Stuff….but first, I need to talk about the POTUS, sorry!
Before
writing the following GSE segment, I had a lengthy indictment of the months since
Donald Trump was elected.
But—you’ll
be happy to know—I shelved virtually all of that anger to concentrate on the
bizarre, appalling, and blind ass-sucking and kissing DJT did with Russia’s Putin
this past weekend to make my case how lame he is as our President.
No matter their political party or
ideology, every American President for the past 75 years has mistrusted, seen
through, or just detested the governments of the Soviet Union and Russia with
great cause…except for our current President.
Those Oval Office
tenants found Russians to be perennial liars, cheats, duplicitous, disingenuous,
jealous, literal and figurative thieves, and anti-American thuggish
troublemakers.
Foreign
policy experts on both sides of their aisle, plus the media have compiled fact
after fact of Putin’s interference in our 2016 elections and other anti-America
machinations going back long before Donald Trump thought to run for office.
But Donald
Trump believes Vladimir Putin and Russian are innocent of that corrupt action? Maybe because he won the Electoral College
votes owing to Russia’s help or because Trump Inc. is closer the Donald’s long
time commercial lust to do business with Russia, build hotels, golf courses casinos,
and sell them Trump tchotchkes?
Donald Trump
has been a presidential disappointment on so many levels, but the American
people have some choices before he runs again in 2020, the primary one being to
vote against any official seeking public office who acts as a Trump enabler or
backs DJT’s pugnacious and virulent nationalism and USA-weakening policy choices.
It‘s easy
watch what those candidates do and say. Once noted, follow your instincts at
the local, state, and federal levels and vote accordingly.
Can readers honestly
say they ever have seen so much internecine US hostility and anger in our
system of government, at every level?
For me, it
is very hard to disassociate those things we see daily from the poison and
license Donald Trump has spewed into our culture in the past year.
Look at how
the Conservative church-going folks of Alabama, sickeningly, are trying to
twist the Bible to defend Roy Moore from charges of molesting young high school
aged women? Is he really as some of those people claim, “Joseph” and the teenage
girls are Mary?”
What
hypocrites!!
How about
“dating” teenage girls, when you are 32, and hanging out at “high schools and
malls,” where those kids congregate, as one of Moore professional colleagues
accused him? Are those habits disqualifying?
Those are
hardcore Trump supporters who can see no wrong in Roy Moore and lots else
around them.
Whomever
objects to my Trump comments, please send me a list of things you believe he has
done well for the American people in the past year, not his billionaire
buddies.
Healthcare
is a mess, we are not trusted by our historic foreign allies, who are essential
if we want to maintain our world leadership; the President’s turning his back
on our senior citizens; his treatment of minorities is outrageous, his has no
intellectual challenge in his mindset, he cannot speak to the masses or orate and
uplift; he just mumbles “great and wonderful” about anything related to him.
A story circulating
in DC.
During a lull during a recent White House
dinner, Melania Trump leaned over to chat with Secretary of State, Rex
Tillerson.
"You
know, I bought Donald a parrot for his birthday in June. That
bird is so smart, Donald has already taught him to say over two hundred
words!"
"That's
very impressive," said Tillerson, "but, you do realize that he just
speaks the words. He doesn't really understand what they mean."
"Oh,
I know", replied Melania, "neither does the parrot."
Fannie Freddie, listen to the air
escape!
The air has
gone out—only temporarily, I hope—of future consideration of the GSEs as
shareholder owned entities.
That matter
has been overtaken both by greater Trump political and revenue priorities and
most GSE talk has been the virtue-less
variety, see recent House Banking Committee hearing, where Peter Wallison strummed
his shopworn “get the government out of the mortgage finance world”—to Committee
Republican huzzahs--and the GOP committee members then found some virtue in the
MBA’s plan (drawn up by Wells Fargo) to gut Fannie and Freddie and put the nation’s
behemoth financial institutions in charge.
Those
Congressmen and women clearly do not understand how the mortgage finance
world works or even how consumer demand for homeownership operates. But they respond
faithfully to the anti-GSE dog whistles.
You Hill
folks. If you buy into Wallison, you won’t have the Red, White, and Blue mortgage
finance vehicles which provide your constituents with most of their home loans,
no FHA, VA, Fannie and Freddie, Farmer Mac’s Ag loans, the Home Loan Bank
System.
If you differ
with Wallison and the AEI and embrace the MBA’s scheme, you endorse a systemic
giveaway to the big banks with new federal financial guarantees to insure
against, i.e. bail out, bank mortgage security losses.
In saluting
both PW and the MBA, this embarrassing display by the committee’s R’s
establishes that they don’t understand the MBA would create a major new federal
subsidy for big bank security losses. (What,
there’s gambling at Rick’s??) Or that, inherent in the MBA plan—is a systemic
destruction and chaos that would rattle the mortgage market for years and drive
up prices for everyone and that’s before congressional Republicans screw over
housing and homeownership in their respective tax bills—all, primarily, to give
corporate America a major tax break it doesn’t need.
Excuse me,
but what goobers! That’s the only word for those tasked with trying to design
some new mortgage finance operational plan and struggling, because they refuse
to consider or even understand the many virtues and strengths of the current
system, which just needs some tweaking not destroying.
Please
Congress remember: The big banks don’t do good things. They don’t do housing
policy, are not illiamsibnary; they do things for money. There is nothing,
nothing wrong with that but Congress shouldn’t’ confuse the major banks
economic function and role, as well as their sorry history of violating federal
laws and regulations in just the past 10 years. (See more than $200 Billion in
fines and penalties.)
GSEs and the recent Election Results
Let me draw
a small link between last Tuesday Democratic wins in Virginia, New Jersey, and
elsewhere.
While
wishing and hoping they are, I don’t think they yet represent a significant
rising rejection of the Trump phenomenon, although it’s folly to ignore them.
Next year,
2018, is a congressional election year when every House Member is up, plus a
handful of GOP Senators (and more Senate D’s).
Even without
having to carry the Trump albatross, the GOP will be reluctant to risk controversy
and dramatic change by further hampering Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, wounding more
the nation’s conventional mortgage finance system.
You can
double underline that, if the tax bills tear up years of homeownership friendly
provisions in current tax law.
A huge gaggle
of House and Senate R’s will freeze, kick the can down the road—again—and will
not move on killing or shackling the GSEs, more than they are now, when control
of the House is at stake.
Certainly not
because the MBA and others—including some Senators and Congressmen--push a big
bank controlled “mortgage system pig in a poke,” which they’ll argue is better
than what exists today because Fannie and Freddie largely controlling what
occurs in the primary mortgage market, where borrowers go to lenders for loans,
using the GSE secondary market guidelines for underwriting specs.
But that’s
precisely why the current system is better, the GSEs do act as a governor on what
the big guys would like to push onto consumers. But, to appreciate that, you
have to understand how the mortgage market works and why borrowers make the
loan choices they do?
Near term, I
don’t believe the anti-GSE market destroyers will succeed. It won’t happen.
But that
doesn’t make me happy, just disappointed in Mnuchin his pals and plans,
which—as noted have been overtaken—by the many other higher priority items on
his plate, like tax reform, the federal Budget deficit, helping the big banks,
and a variety of international issues on which he must have an opinion.
Obviously,
that leaves matters with the courts where things are moving glacially and most
experts say we are two years from anything definitive, including a possible
Supreme Court review.
But—as I’ve
written before—if the Trump Administration finds it desperately needs a fresh
$100 Billion or more, it has the Treasury warrants which gives the federal
government 90% ownership of the GSEs and
which could be monetized quickly into much needed cash, although at the expense
of keeping Fannie and Freddie alive.
As the next
few months unfold, the GSE issue—because of the “big casino” nature of the
warrants—will be fascinating dilemma for Mnuchin and the POTUS. We all should
hope they both are pragmatists not ideologues.
Tax Reform and housing issues
Here’s a
suggestion which some major Republican might want to consider, plus it might
add credibility to their tax efforts.
Yes, cut
corporate rates but make it contingent on recipient companies, first, making
the capital investments in plant, equipment, and technology which will produce
the fresh new jobs they all promise. Let them take the mandatory steps to
invest desired capital in people, process, and places and then reward them.
Pretend you
are from Missouri and tell the major corporate recipients, “Show me” and then
we’ll cut your tax rates.
Also, at
what point—if Congress succeeds in cutting the MIDI deductions for most
homeowners and doing away with the deductions for state and local taxes, and
then also attempt euthanizing Fannie and Freddie, does the public stand up and
say those anti-housing GOP policies aren’t’ going to help me buy a home or even
keep the one I have, let alone live on any equity I have built up?
The National
Association of Realtors sent a very strong letter to GOP Members last week opposing
the tax provisions in the House bill.
https://www.nar.realtor/newsroom/op-eds-and-letters-to-the-editor/gop-tax-reform-will-mean-tax-hike-on-middle-class-homeowners-nar
The NAR and
the National Association of Homebuilders each will have hundreds of their association
member fly-ins this week, visiting every House and Senate office making their
views known on these changes.
A Big GSE Loss, Gretchen Morgenson
When
Gretchen Morgenson announced a week ago that she was leaving her “Fair Game”
column on the front page of the Sunday New York Times business section—after 20
years--and moving across town to the Wall Street Journal, IMO, it was a trip of
a million miles to a new publication whose editorial board vilified Fannie and
Freddie for the past 25 years, with no let up.
The WSJ
ownership and senior management will not look fondly on someone writing as constructively
and insightfully about the GSEs and about what trials and tribulations they
have faced at the hands of bad government policy as Gretchen has.
Morgenson’s
a smart, powerful woman with a grand, hardnosed perspective, but the reality is
that her new professional home won’t welcome her GSE sympathies nor should we
expect her to continue writing about Fannie and Freddie as she did when working
for the NYT.
We GSE fans should
thank her for what she accomplished on our behalf for championing certain
matters in her much read column.
To the world of journalism and
journalists, currently there is a vacant media position at the top of the GSE
heap, waiting for someone to seize that mantle and write accurately and
forcefully about what Fannie and Freddie have offered and still can, if policy
makers can cut through the Gordian knot of lies and falsehood which still
surround them today.
Maloni, 11-14-17
5 comments:
Perhaps the WSJ will be persuaded by Ms. Morgenson?
BTW...here's the unexpurgated version of The New GSE Soft Shoe (#Fanniegate Blues No. 8)", Lyrics written by the mysterious and well-heeled "Crownjewels".
This is the only Musical (I refer to its tonal variations over time not its [ahem] Merit) GSE Plan and one that will no doubt put us investors in the (it will be crowded) proverbial "catbird seat". Until then put on your Stubbs and Woottons and boogie 'til the cows come home!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x90rBh8YKro
Fanniegate Blues # 8: The New GSE Soft Shoe
11E them’s fo’ me, tuck ‘em with mah stocks of Fan and Freddie
11E that's for me, tuck ‘em with my stocks of Fan and Freddie
They're the most, from coast to coast, making loans for families
The GSE names are singing up and down the line
GSE names are singing up and down the line
Hurry up ‘Nooch make that girl and boy so fine
You gotta stop the GOP & banks from eatin' their lunch
You gotta stop the GOP & banks from eatin' their lunch
Listen to Tim Howard, he’ll give you his very best hunch
Make ‘em privately owned utilities, they’ll return a passel
Make ‘em privately owned utilities, they’ll return a passel
An’ Corker/Warner’s "Shit Wall" gang’ll face a major hassle!
It has a lilt to it.
As I might have said 60 years ago to Dick Clark (host of "Americna Bandstand" for you craven youth), I like the beat, the like the words, but it's tough to dance to it!"
Link regarding yesterday's NYT editorial about DJT turtling when in the presence of totalitarian leaders.
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/360270-nyt-on-trump-a-man-who-loves-to-bully-people-turns-to-mush-in-company-of
Look at what I wrote in the blog about giving the corporate tax cut a year AFTER companies made capital investments in production operations, personnel, and processes.
In other words make them walk the walk.
Here is an excerpt from an AOL news story, today, about a meeting Gary Cohn had with corproate execs and look back at my suggetsion for the "why" of it.
"Republicans have given Democrats plenty of fodder in that case, walking back an earlier promise that no middle-class family would be harmed by their proposed tax reform.
"And Gary Cohn, one of Trump’s economic advisers, put his foot in his mouth Tuesday after asking a group of CEOs whether they would use the money their companies receive in tax cuts to boost job growth.
"Few CEOs raised their hands."
Goood reading this post
Post a Comment